IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] [mpls] Comments on draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0764411E8112; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KJh89uP-Vdm6; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0851521F9C00; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=362; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1377098554; x=1378308154; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8atm9my2TbSk2JwQNT/n6LDv+MzBWZSGzQMIOKJgWmI=; b=mBHnIe+n+4Am4yLydb2kmEl/0cuRGV+A1r/SxXBF2NuJhxbJ5vntd54i 4JSvqYRx1q8Wm4iMCELOwOnTXQFfxeVF3P3j1bjcvT6nWbpbzNP2F7veA R9ekada7wgA8Eit8sYYEk2wbbdb+cj2qtXHSQE3z8nXnMVoOTtKbY/ktq U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFAHjaFFKQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABagwW9Z4J6gR8WdIIkAQEBBDhAARALGAkWDwkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGIDK1ckFUHhBQDl2WRVoMd
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,928,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="158727268"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2013 15:22:27 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7LFMPsG019998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:22:26 GMT
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id r7LFMLEQ007322; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:22:21 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <5214DB2D.2000809@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:22:21 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "S. Davari" <davarish@yahoo.com>
References: <51FB7543.801@cisco.com> <F9336571731ADE42A5397FC831CEAA0215124FCE@ILPTWPVEXMB02.ecitele.com> <C356618E-C662-4979-B70A-3277AAF4CD02@yahoo.com> <51FF7068.9080600@cisco.com> <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BEC731A@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <F9336571731ADE42A5397FC831CEAA0215132641@ILPTWPVEXMB01.ecitele.com> <D0E64B9E-D670-4419-AD5C-9E476F8DA0A8@yahoo.com> <52139903.8040801@cisco.com> <F9336571731ADE42A5397FC831CEAA021513A083@ILPTWPVEXMB01.ecitele.com> <B7A656C4-6D0E-4719-9E42-57689CDAEFA9@yahoo.com> <F9336571731ADE42A5397FC831CEAA021513A0C6@ILPTWPVEXMB01.ecitele.com> <52149A2D.3050109@cisco.com> <5ADB2697-BC53-427A-82DB-013B89029343@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <5ADB2697-BC53-427A-82DB-013B89029343@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] [mpls] Comments on draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:22:40 -0000

yes, but they are one hop tunnels.

S

On 21/08/2013 15:19, S. Davari wrote:
> Hi Stewart,
>
> Your proposal does tunneling between timing aware nodes but I guess it stitches multiple of those tunnels to create and end-2-end connection. Right?
>
> Sasha's BoS proposal seems simpler, since it requires a single end-2-end LSP.
>
> Regards,
> Shahram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email