Re: [TICTOC] draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls-06 comments
Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com> Mon, 28 April 2014 16:53 UTC
Return-Path: <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BA11A0A38 for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lJVIzQe2Egko for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x232.google.com (mail-oa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F241A0A1D for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id i11so7494459oag.23 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dfq6XaUIfasDDxKiPsdRai9kxsUi2+CVNb8mKB8qxBg=; b=DiRTVPQtGqFpQf7B2NtQWGEA1UYt2cx72LDvFrKDQyIbeQAHTyg1Ud8v4Sp5puKMzg tY9OY+9cQBY3BYhskYnqvOLiW5QHrycWrgrOF4l4hnkLrZG0auJ4CghRBnBF+ZsCWTmQ ADd8zeVXYHyNYxADhb4P/PtNqmvEz/t3qwneUuJCK6ThaiRJ+6TpXYcOGghA4Sqt1J3H wF8w+UU5UMoDxF0csufZ6MX2mDMgri8KH/WtA5XxH6V0e094SHl7NuQSfV9pDkc0De5F PLmIXmQtEuQHcPuJ77uLNlJIL5iwd1QqMx07joHJI/1aF3Ph+b9u+juv5DdVFdM6fJ2R cmWw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.135.106 with SMTP id pr10mr23349394oeb.15.1398703983408; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.77.97 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <287eb6668e0c48ccb1488c92f5ac168f@SG70YWXCHHUB03.zap.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <20140428160410.4246.17468.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20211F91F544D247976D84C5D778A4C32E5FAB39@SG70YWXCHMBA05.zap.alcatel-lucent.com> <287eb6668e0c48ccb1488c92f5ac168f@SG70YWXCHHUB03.zap.alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:23:03 +0530
Message-ID: <CAG1kdogTSBgNW==GACU--1syEvyur70MoJ681PoEMshcM5jQPw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
To: "Meyer, Peter" <Peter.Meyer@microsemi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/OG_eZvt0HMG0IeQCkSXZfUK_kyQ
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:04:35 -0700
Cc: "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls-06 comments
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:53:06 -0000
Hi Peter, This wasnt intentional. Let me take a look at why certain sections got removed -- i think its an editorial issue. Cheers, Manav On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Meyer, Peter <Peter.Meyer@microsemi.com> wrote: > > Hi Manav, > > I notice a number of changes to BC support that I did not see discussed on the reflector between draft-05 and draft-06. Moving from draft-04 to draft-05 there was a significant effort to understand how TC (both P2P and E2E) and BC work with LER and LSR and there seemed to be agreement on the draft-05 text on that topic (I worked a good deal with Shahram on the text). > > Related, I would note that the ITU-T has finished the first network deployment scenarios, clock chain and performance specs for IEEE1588 with phase/time support and it uses BC in every network element (see ITU-T G.8275, G.8271, G.8273.2, etc.). > > > Specifically my comments on draft-06 changes > > 1) Section 15.2 the following text has been deleted > "When a Timing-capable/aware LSR behaves as a Boundary clock and receives a Timing message from a Timing-capable/aware MPLS interface. The LSR performs the functions of a Boundary Clock in terminating the received Timing message and re-generating a new timing message over another (or the same) MPLS interface." > > 2) Section 15.3 the following text has been deleted > "or BC" > > 3) Section 18, the Applicability statement was removed from draft-04 to draft-05. It has now be re-introduced. Text should include the draft-04 proposal (before the entire section was removed) > "o An LSR receives MPLS encapsulated Timing messages from a Timing LSP and terminates them, while performing the OC or BC functionality." > > > Regards, > Peter > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: TICTOC [mailto:tictoc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bhatia, Manav (Manav) > Sent: April 28, 2014 12:09 PM > To: tictoc@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [TICTOC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls-06.txt > > Hi Yaakov, > > This version addresses the final set of comments that we received as per the MPLS and TICTOC WG last call. > > Can we move it further now? > > Cheers, Manav > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: TICTOC [mailto:tictoc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- >> drafts@ietf.org >> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 9:34 PM >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >> Cc: tictoc@ietf.org >> Subject: [TICTOC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls-06.txt >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Timing over IP Connection and >> Transfer of Clock Working Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : Transporting Timing messages over MPLS >> Networks >> Authors : Shahram Davari >> Amit Oren >> Manav Bhatia >> Peter Roberts >> Laurent Montini >> Filename : draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls-06.txt >> Pages : 36 >> Date : 2014-04-28 >> >> Abstract: >> This document defines the method for transporting Timing messages >> such as PTP and NTP over an MPLS network. The method allows for the >> easy identification of these PDUs at the port level to allow for >> port >> level processing of these PDUs in both LERs and LSRs. >> >> The basic idea is to transport Timing messages inside dedicated MPLS >> LSPs. These LSPs only carry Timing messages and possibly Control >> and >> Management packets, but they do not carry customer traffic. >> >> Two methods for transporting Timing messages over MPLS are defined. >> The first method is to transport Timing messages directly over the >> dedicated MPLS LSP via UDP/IP encapsulation, which is suitable for >> MPLS networks. The second method is to transport Timing messages >> inside a PW via Ethernet encapsulation. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls/ >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls-06 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls-06 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TICTOC mailing list >> TICTOC@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc > > _______________________________________________ > TICTOC mailing list > TICTOC@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
- Re: [TICTOC] draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls-06 co… Meyer, Peter
- [TICTOC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmp… internet-drafts
- Re: [TICTOC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tictoc-1588ov… Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: [TICTOC] draft-ietf-tictoc-1588overmpls-06 co… Manav Bhatia
- Re: [TICTOC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tictoc-1588ov… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [TICTOC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tictoc-1588ov… Shahram Davari