Re: [TICTOC] Ignas Bagdonas' Discuss on draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10: (with DISCUSS)

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Mon, 15 October 2018 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9934A130EAC; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z2ZZAWaiVsgN; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58F07130DE4; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C1FC3487743E7; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 06:29:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from DGGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.93]) by DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 06:29:32 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang@ietf.org>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "tictoc-chairs@ietf.org" <tictoc-chairs@ietf.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ignas Bagdonas' Discuss on draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHUYWtq7gcIQPWGakqJ6dNOZC7j+aUg4twg
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:29:32 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBC22FFA2@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <153926668872.14768.4905773143098681235.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <153926668872.14768.4905773143098681235.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.171.67]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/RLhNaz6nX6U1QDuhY9FYZgjAWSg>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Ignas Bagdonas' Discuss on draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:29:47 -0000

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The model was not reviewed by YANG doctors, at least there is no record of
> such
> review. It should be, especially given the subject area of the model is not a
> native IETF technology.
> 
Review requests for the WG Last Call draft (that is, draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-5) and the resolution draft (draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-6) had been sent to NETMOD, TICTOC and IEEE 1588 WG for their reviews, and we received quite a lot of valuable comments from participants in these work groups. 

YANG Doctor review was assigned to Mehmet by Benoit in this email as I am aware:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg18893.html

But indeed we haven't received any comments from Mehmet until now. 

BTW, draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-05 model has been integrated into the ONF's CENTENNIAL project (ONF wireless transport):
https://github.com/OpenNetworkingFoundation/CENTENNIAL/tree/master/models/yang
According to the ONF news, multiple vendors took part in the PTP synchronization use case (seems mainly based on this draft) and successfully demonstrated its interoperability.
Please see more the details in the following link:
https://www.opennetworking.org/news-and-events/blog/onfs-open-transport-working-group-completes-fourth-wireless-transport-poc/

Thanks,
Yuanlong