Re: [TICTOC] Enterprise profile comments
Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 13:17 UTC
Return-Path: <talmi@marvell.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF32421F9EAD for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcdq-2rQnncj for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0B521F8203 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SC-OWA01.marvell.com ([199.233.58.136]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob113.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUfkOFta+OiV1gewy3AyBa6MASMObJGqw@postini.com; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:16:12 PDT
Received: from YK-HUB01.marvell.com (10.4.102.51) by sc-owa01.marvell.com (10.93.76.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:13:43 -0700
Received: from IL-MB01.marvell.com ([10.4.102.53]) by YK-HUB01.marvell.com ([10.4.102.51]) with mapi; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:13:41 +0300
From: Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com>
To: Douglas Arnold <doug.arnold2@gmail.com>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, "Heiko.gerstung@meinberg.de" <Heiko.gerstung@meinberg.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:13:36 +0300
Thread-Topic: [TICTOC] Enterprise profile comments
Thread-Index: Ac59bwcf68rC8RWmQCuxyL7Gr0FP6QQgJIOA
Message-ID: <74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01A0FA10A369@IL-MB01.marvell.com>
References: <CACQYgzEfFq0S1+aASOZ3VcODVMoaDDPhcDkM4Hi=o7ihLFhv1A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACQYgzEfFq0S1+aASOZ3VcODVMoaDDPhcDkM4Hi=o7ihLFhv1A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01A0FA10A369ILMB01marve_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Enterprise profile comments
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:17:22 -0000
Hi Heiko, Doug, Thanks for putting this draft together. I believe it can be very useful to the industry. After going over the updated draft I have a single comment: Please consider allowing unicast negotiation. The reason I am raising this is that multi-path PTP (draft-shpiner-multi-path-synchronization) would require Sync messages to be sent as unicast, and hence require unicast negotiation. I believe MPPTP can be useful in the context of this profile, allowing both redundancy and higher accuracy in some scenarios. Will appreciate if you can give this some thought. Thanks, Tal.
- [TICTOC] Enterprise profile comments Douglas Arnold
- Re: [TICTOC] Enterprise profile comments Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [TICTOC] Enterprise profile comments Douglas Arnold