[TICTOC] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-26: (with COMMENT)

[Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-26: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Thank you to Tero Kivinen for his careful review of draft 24.  While some of
his of his points were addressed, there are still some that remain in draft 26.
 I will only highlight a few of these:
  - The use of MUST NOT in cases where a positive requirement could be used,
  where a direct requirement of MUST can be used.  Often MUST is clearer to
  understand. - For PTP Management messages, the discrepency of 'MAY' in
  Section 12 and SHOULD NOT in Section 18 need to be reconciled.  (My
  recommendation would be to change Section 12 to 'SHOULD NOT')