Re: [TICTOC] Enterprise Profile

[Douglas Arnold <[e-mail]>]

Hello John,

I agree that local time is useful.  I would not be averse to creating a TLV
to distribute local time offset, so that end node can convert to local time
and present it to users.

However, I do not support the idea of using a local time epoch in the PTP
timestamp fields. This is an allowed option in IEEE 1588-2008, but I
believe that this is likely to cause interoperability problems, when some
vendors support it and others do not.  Also some system architechs have
indicated that they deploy PTP across large networks, which span time
zones. This is the feature that should be forbidden.

In the NTP standard (RFC5905) the timestamps in the packet all use a
specific time epoch, and generate all other desired time epoch as
corrections performed at the end points.  Note also that in most computer
operating systems a single standard time epoch is used in and local time is
generated at the presentation layer for human readable interfaces.

Doug


On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:10 AM, John Fletcher <[e-mail]>wrote:

>  I'd also like to ask that you don't prohibit the Alternate Timescales
> option.  This is potentially useful to distribute "local time" (your
> time-zone and dst) and there doesn't seem to be any need to prohibit it.
>
>  John
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* [e-mail] [[e-mail]] on behalf of
> John Fletcher [[e-mail]]
> *Sent:* 25 October 2013 11:01
> *To:* Douglas Arnold
> *Cc:* [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [TICTOC] Enterprise Profile
>
>    Doug,
>
>
>
> I would be interested to know the circumstances when you see the maximum
> phase adjustment information being used.
>
>
>
> Some comments:
>
>
>
> In section 6, you say, “In all three of the delay measurement modes…”.  At
> that point in the text you have not yet mentioned multicast, hybrid and
> unicast modes so it’s not clear which modes you are referring to.
>
>
>
> In section 9, you say, “Slaves SHOULD NOT Synchronize to a Rogue Master.”
> It’s not clear how a slave would know that a master is rogue; presumably it
> would need to examine the announce messages of all masters and do its own
> BMCA evaluation.  A more realistic “rogue” master would probably meet the
> BMCA criteria for selection.
>
>
>
> In section 12, “Alternative Time Scales” should be “Alternate Timescales”.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John Fletcher
>
>
>
> *From:* [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] *On
> Behalf Of *Douglas Arnold
> *Sent:* 25 October 2013 01:35
> *To:* [e-mail]
> *Subject:* [TICTOC] Enterprise Profile
>
>
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
>
>
> Attached is an updated version of the Enterprise profile.  Sorry I missed
> the upload deadline for  the Vancouver meeting.  If you get a chance to
> look at it before then I will be there and would love to discuss it.
>
>
>
> Summary of changes:
>
>
>
> I also changed the TLV format to fit the latest proposal in the 1588
> revision.
>
>
>
> I added a statement about not going into the master state unless one had a
> current UTC offset.
>
>
>
> I added to the TLV fields to indicate maximum phase correction over a sync
> cycle.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Doug Arnold
>
> Principal Technologist
>
> *JTime!* Meinberg USA
>
> [phone]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>
> ---------------------
>
>
>
> ----------------------------
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>
> ---------------------
>



-- 
Doug