[TICTOC] Updated TICTOC Security Requirements

Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com> Thu, 25 April 2013 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <talmi@marvell.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55B121F8A18 for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lNk0P2M2asjB for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog112.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog112.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.207]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DF721F88EA for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc-owa02.marvell.com ([199.233.58.137]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob112.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUXk0lwwT/kCBeS3/3QZ07eLd9jRWA433@postini.com; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:50:29 PDT
Received: from YK-HUB01.marvell.com (10.4.102.51) by sc-owa02.marvell.com (10.93.76.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:49:57 -0700
Received: from IL-MB01.marvell.com ([10.4.102.53]) by YK-HUB01.marvell.com ([10.4.102.51]) with mapi; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:49:53 +0300
From: Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com>
To: "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, "odonoghue@isoc.org" <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "Yaakov Stein (yaakov_s@rad.com)" <yaakov_s@rad.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:49:51 +0300
Thread-Topic: Updated TICTOC Security Requirements
Thread-Index: Ac5BuiZMjCtSCoq1RjSqII8TtL5nOg==
Message-ID: <74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01A0F9A356C3@IL-MB01.marvell.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01A0F9A356C3ILMB01marve_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [TICTOC] Updated TICTOC Security Requirements
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:50:30 -0000

Hi,

Following the comments received on the WGLC I updated the draft - mostly minor editorial updates.
The most notable changes compared to draft 04:


1.       I added some text in the introduction about the target audience of the document.

2.       I changed "time synchronization protocols" to "time protocols", as this seems to be the common grounds of NTP and PTP, both of which end with a TP (Time Protocol). Seems like a fair compromise between Yaakov's suggestion and Kevin's (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/current/msg01382.html).

The current draft can be found in:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-05

Thanks,
Tal.