Re: [Time] Editor's proposed draft of TIME/LIME Problem Statement

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Tue, 09 September 2014 01:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: time@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: time@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B98C1A0344 for <time@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SImNOt8OlZMk for <time@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 049C81A0342 for <time@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id tr6so2410092ieb.27 for <time@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Edtw5SMoYC3X5IggZsa2J2R6Wo7Ygy4qJJr+49EyFeY=; b=o3oqjDcypoGhQ9QXex+16LHTofhxubGAHYvr0ooAyKAOmxl/ZHdK+efHFXWQDKRHni VRhdQKERMOyON92OCcp7h3J8703eCnhYOvdmyOXLM+5vmltvt28f50EO9/fcnBASUAoa zrPrRzLqinjxQEiHwOg2p/beYO/h/gPUvqz/rkMEPJQbMe1igWZEMi59rr3sXTaOZBlz qC0t3u/7iK13FWWrTJTlaWKJBASoDXTfxM0kgk0MSh+AwqxAIRSt3KR6zHMS3/WUWhZE supnZJiJhTvBA7C2CM/6FxUUdboYRE1bjqJFwsM0kiijtaowqYaxIzfPJMBlvOqYPKiv EkXQ==
X-Received: by 10.42.39.142 with SMTP id h14mr36329264ice.32.1410224898458; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.97.17] ([67.210.160.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o20sm10522741igw.11.2014.09.08.18.08.17 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <540E52F6.2030308@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 21:08:06 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, 'Jouni' <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
References: <5409DA04.2020200@gmail.com> <461483BC-58E7-483D-8B81-FB15C015C4B7@gmail.com> <540CF8B2.10006@gmail.com> <008301cfcb9e$714d33f0$53e79bd0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <008301cfcb9e$714d33f0$53e79bd0$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/time/EvmEGQkXyRT8_Vzor1kGhnJq5TU
Cc: time@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Time] Editor's proposed draft of TIME/LIME Problem Statement
X-BeenThere: time@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Transport Independent OAM in Multi-Layer network Entity \(TIME\) discussion list." <time.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/time>, <mailto:time-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/time/>
List-Post: <mailto:time@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:time-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/time>, <mailto:time-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 01:08:20 -0000

Thanks, Dan

I also had a few helpful comments from Mishael Wexler regarding 
terminology and the problem statement itself to fold in. Given the 
announcement from the ADs, the work on the current PS seems to be 
overtaken by events, and attention should shift to drafting a charter.

I'll do the updates to draft-edprop and submit it as a matter of record. 
Some of it should be useful in the charter drafting.

Tom

On 08/09/2014 3:52 PM, Daniel King wrote:
> Hi Tom and Jouni,
>
> The vision statement for layer/technology independent management would be a
> useful addition in the P-S document.
>
> Br, Dan.
> 	
...