IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tlp-interest] Request to designate TLP Section 6 as Code Components

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 03 November 2009 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tlp-interest@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tlp-interest@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819A728C122 for <tlp-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:52:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.364
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.364 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.235, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pnZg1y+wf8H3 for <tlp-interest@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:52:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B073A6A50 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:52:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0159A4787; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:53:43 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dw2TUo+xf7W4; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:53:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from THINKPADR52.vigilsec.com (pool-173-66-67-45.washdc.fios.verizon.net [173.66.67.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DB29A4744; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:53:42 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:47:38 -0500
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <87k4y7zba7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <87k4y7zba7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <20091103215342.E1DB29A4744@odin.smetech.net>
Cc: tlp-interest@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tlp-interest] Request to designate TLP Section 6 as Code Components
X-BeenThere: tlp-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <tlp-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tlp-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:52:57 -0000

I do not understand this request.  Section 6 is boilerplate text, not code.

Russ


At 01:57 PM 11/3/2009, Florian Weimer wrote:
>I would like to see the required texts in Section 6 of the TLP
>designated as Code Components, so that they can be included in xml2rfc
>per Section 5 of the TLP.
>
>Who could make such a change, and who should I ask?

v2.40.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status