Re: [tlp-interest] [Trustees] Question about 6.c.iii Legend - Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 7450 <draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
Jorge Contreras <cntreras@gmail.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <cntreras@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0A61A8AC4; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:08:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AgEWKTsjSe1d; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34471A1AC7; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wp4so2445858obc.10; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:07:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=57wzRmlf4FtfcVLnfR+yjA3EtxtZb5AkIcFxCewDwmE=; b=s1gBHrzhkiig9NPji6xoM4Lt9fyevgXTq2Jl405EYV2dBVg/6RS2Pii15Ivl2D7OQT JTI7QpV70e6eOpWjE912vx4zoQRemH2xBb5aa8trgJZgZ/kOBi2X264Kp0rZRo2vh6g3 RJk5KtMWwOYirTD6e78CJvdtM67WpknDITFRR1vC5eorUsTiLteHPzJYrOFyuphVlx8K lAk0cV9DP+w6RTC4XDF2RGyvlOzG0qBbVr4/9cQAMMf6ivN4qNl5+T2THAT26TxFxvOf +yoD2Kv5E+XKaD2vti9idQfRxbFOjyG4rILF9DR0Io7SQTmL7PwZ3Ghv4mksu8OG3Qc7 doPg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.74.8 with SMTP id p8mr19815435oev.42.1423069674982; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:07:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.26.44 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:07:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1CA6E563-95F5-439A-92B5-5D1A2E2C9CD1@sobco.com>
References: <20150203004612.5BECA1832B6@rfc-editor.org> <CAJkfEFrnHypEY5qX+ko5TO2N3AGtpYS_2T+iVmWcfVt1Mi-tbg@mail.gmail.com> <20150204155636.GA30450@rfc-editor.org> <20150204155916.GB30450@rfc-editor.org> <1CA6E563-95F5-439A-92B5-5D1A2E2C9CD1@sobco.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:07:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP0PwYbrqnQKoE9J2ajA-EicvvZCH46t_6iQBDE2JbnHhTrU+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jorge Contreras <cntreras@gmail.com>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1135e80677d1c6050e463ad2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tlp-interest/8c6dZXnZ5QHL7_ncpxVeU9gkWx4>
Cc: mboned-ads@tools.ietf.org, "<mboned-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <mboned-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Trustees <trustees@ietf.org>, tlp-interest@ietf.org, Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>, Greg Bumgardner <gbumgard@gmail.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [tlp-interest] [Trustees] Question about 6.c.iii Legend - Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 7450 <draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: tlp-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <tlp-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tlp-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:08:08 -0000
TLP 4.0 is the current TLP, so it is in use for all new IETF documents. Its use is not optional. If the text is new and not derivative of a pre-5378 document, then the pre-5378 legend can be dropped. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Scott O. Bradner <sob@sobco.com> wrote: > if the text i new, why not use TPL 4.0? > > Scott > > > On Feb 4, 2015, at 10:59 AM, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > > > Adding <trustees@ietf.org> to the CC. > > > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 07:56:36AM -0800, RFC Editor wrote: > >> Hi Greg, > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:54:14PM -0800, Greg Bumgardner wrote: > >>> All, > >>> > >> [snip] > >> > >>> I do have a question regarding the LPR/copyright declaration. The > pre-RFC-5378 > >>> designation was a carry-over from a much older version of the ID > document. > >>> The ID was completely re-written in 2011/12 and probably contains very > >>> little, if any, text from the older drafts, going back nearly a decade > now. > >>> Can/Should the LPR be changed to TPL 4.0? I don't recall any discussion > >>> regarding the LPR declaration since I began work on the spec as it > exists > >>> today. > >> > >> Item 4 on the Copyright FAQ > >> <http://trustee.ietf.org/copyright-faq.html> provides some information > >> about when the 6.c.iii Legend should be included. > >> > >> In addition, we have added <trustees@ietf.org> to this thread in the > >> hopes that they can provide additional guidance. > >> > >> Please let us know if any changes are needed. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> RFC Editor/sg > >> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> -g.b. > >>> > >> > >>>> > >>>> Updated 2015/02/02 > >>>> > >>>> RFC Author(s): > >>>> -------------- > >>>> > >>>> Instructions for Completing AUTH48 in XML > >>>> > >>>> This is your last chance to make changes to your RFC-to-be: > >>>> draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18.txt. > >>>> Once the document is published as an RFC, we will not make changes. > >>>> Please follow the instructions below to complete the AUTH48 process. > >>>> (For frequently asked questions, please see > >>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcfaq.html#auth48.) > >>>> > >>>> 1) Review the edited document completely. The files are available > here: > >>>> > >>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7450.txt > >>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7450-diff.html > >>>> > >>>> We recommend reviewing the entire document, not just the diff file. > >>>> FYI, http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff provides tools to make various > >>>> kinds of diff files. > >>>> > >>>> The placement of page breaks will be handled during the final > stages of > >>>> publication (typically post-xml2rfc processing). > >>>> > >>>> 2) Review and resolve (as necessary) any questions raised by the RFC > >>>> Editor. The questions (if any) have been included in the XML file > as > >>>> comments marked <!-- [rfced] ... --> and will be sent in a > subsequent > >>>> email. > >>>> > >>>> Retrieve the edited XML file here: > >>>> > >>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7450.xml > >>>> > >>>> (Note that you may need to view the page source to save the file.) > >>>> > >>>> 3) Send us your changes or respond with your approval for publication. > >>>> Please use 'REPLY ALL' so that rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org and the > >>>> parties > >>>> CC'ed on this message receive your response. Note that your document > >>>> will > >>>> not move forward until we have received approvals from each of the > >>>> authors listed on the front page. > >>>> > >>>> If sending changes, please do one of the following: > >>>> > >>>> a. Update the provided XML file, then email us the revised XML file. > >>>> You may use any filename for the revised file; we will rename it > >>>> before posting it. > >>>> > >>>> --OR-- > >>>> > >>>> b. Provide us with an explicit list of changes in this format. > >>>> > >>>> Section # (or indicate Global) > >>>> > >>>> OLD: > >>>> old text > >>>> > >>>> NEW: > >>>> new text > >>>> > >>>> Be sure to pay particular attention to these areas of the document: > >>>> - IANA Considerations updates (if applicable) > >>>> - Contact information > >>>> - Copyright notice and legends (see item 5 for more details) > >>>> > >>>> 4) Review changes submitted by your coauthors (if any). We assume > that > >>>> you will speak up if you do not agree with the proposed changes. > >>>> That is, your silence is your assent to changes submitted by your > >>>> coauthors. Note that any changes that are beyond editorial will be > >>>> sent to the relevant body for approval. > >>>> > >>>> 5) Review the copyright notice and legends as defined in RFC 5378 and > >>>> the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP -- > >>>> http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/). > >>>> > >>>> If your document was approved for publication with a pre-RFC-5378 > >>>> copyright notice, we have applied the text from section 6.c.iii of > the > >>>> TLP. Please consider whether this text is required (note that the > >>>> 6.c.iii text is not applicable to Alternate Stream RFCs). See item > >>>> 4.5 of the "Copyright FAQ" at http://trustee.ietf.org/faqs.html for > >>>> guidance on whether this text applies to your document. > >>>> > >>>> 6) Please reply, as the document will not be published until we > receive > >>>> approvals from each author. The details of the AUTH48 status of > your > >>>> document are here: > >>>> > >>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc7450 > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for your cooperation, > >>>> > >>>> RFC Editor > >>>> > >>>> -------------------------------------- > >>>> RFC7450 (draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18) > >>>> -------------------------------------- > >>>> Title : Automatic Multicast Tunneling > >>>> Author(s) : G. Bumgardner > >>>> WG Chair(s) : Greg Shepherd, Leonard Giuliano > >>>> Area Director(s) : Benoit Claise, Joel Jaeggli > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Greg Bumgardner > >>> Eugene, OR > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------+ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------+ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Trustees mailing list > > Trustees@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trustees > > _______________________________________________ > Trustees mailing list > Trustees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trustees >
- [tlp-interest] Question about 6.c.iii Legend - Re… RFC Editor
- Re: [tlp-interest] Question about 6.c.iii Legend … RFC Editor
- Re: [tlp-interest] [Trustees] Question about 6.c.… Jorge Contreras