[tlp-interest] Fwd: ALAC Position on the Proposed Amendment to IETF IPMC Bylaws
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 08 December 2025 15:47 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tlp-interest@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tlp-interest@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6AA976EC9B; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 07:47:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4OB6kk2aqif; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 07:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1C4976EC8F; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 07:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B821A15F0; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 10:47:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pool-96-255-71-95.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.71.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33F161A18C7; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 10:47:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\))
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 10:47:26 -0500
References: <D802747E-A244-4672-A995-D588F6E03CA7@icann.org>
To: tlp-interest@ietf.org
Message-Id: <8165FA34-00D2-43C1-B2C8-DA56A6A5F08F@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to:message-id; s=pair-202402141609; bh=6NoQU/LurQqQ6LAZsI2snJsygjx0uH+mAEbL8S3VST4=; b=QSOcKY3xjGUc8St/IodvPwt4KN6OcMudxdzHVtnKTsOkrmUxtasFSDrAf3eWoFLfMfvlacUmPisV/nxJATTljzDREi3H/vNfStiLkPXjm9p2U8v0qpoEzJ9SufjMD5bpSolNw1rhxcrnVduhWkdQ6tQcKmnipSJgaSU3R8DkPAmByqErxqdpNG4IdlEpMfhadz22SorjKCFiRDnAurR57nJaOxMawbp4UEUB5BSxwVUxZqVsJcN6EbLinRXR1sDT3pPW97iMLP/4JSt88ZHPRYSUdREEnZEnwFC5vmxTOvFHcqcKjTIFz/y6oJx5rU2OuHDni29okk+ya/KdhrCpLw==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09
Message-ID-Hash: FZJZZXIXB4MTR6XFSKBW5THJBF2UUOPO
X-Message-ID-Hash: FZJZZXIXB4MTR6XFSKBW5THJBF2UUOPO
X-MailFrom: housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 3.3.9rc6
CC: trustees IETF <trustees@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [tlp-interest] Fwd: ALAC Position on the Proposed Amendment to IETF IPMC Bylaws
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <tlp-interest.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tlp-interest/NVPgsO5jVt3ZhUMYOXSKp72QOKg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tlp-interest>
List-Help: <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tlp-interest-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tlp-interest-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tlp-interest-leave@ietf.org>
Sharing comments that were sent to the CCG to make the visible to the whole community. Russ > From: Ozan Sahin <ozan.sahin@icann.org> > Subject: ALAC Position on the Proposed Amendment to IETF IPMC Bylaws > Date: December 4, 2025 at 4:05:39 PM EST > To: "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, "chair@nro.net" <chair@nro.net>, "housley@vigilsec.com" <housley@vigilsec.com> > Cc: "cw@christopherwilkinson.eu" <cw@christopherwilkinson.eu>, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>, John Jeffrey <john.jeffrey@icann.org>, "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > Dear co-chairs of the IANA IPR CCG, > > Please find attached a letter from the ALAC chair Jonathan Zuck regarding the ALAC Position on the Proposed Amendment to IETF IPMC Bylaws. > > Best regards, > ALAC support staff > 
- [tlp-interest] Fwd: ALAC Position on the Proposed… Russ Housley
- [tlp-interest] Re: ALAC Position on the Proposed … Russ Housley
- [tlp-interest] Re: ALAC Position on the Proposed … Brian E Carpenter
- [tlp-interest] Re: ALAC Position on the Proposed … Siameh Mensah
- [tlp-interest] Re: ALAC Position on the Proposed … John Levine
- [tlp-interest] Re: ALAC Position on the Proposed … Russ Housley
- [tlp-interest] Re: [Trustees] Re: ALAC Position o… Glenn Deen
- [tlp-interest] Re: ALAC Position on the Proposed … Brian E Carpenter
- [tlp-interest] Re: ALAC Position on the Proposed … Jay Daley
- [tlp-interest] Re: ALAC Position on the Proposed … Brian E Carpenter