[tlp-interest] Question about 6.c.iii Legend - Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 7450 <draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 04 February 2015 15:56 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4461A8A7B for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:56:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j6R56kT_kdxM for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEE11A8A61 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 6000) id 5B1D718380A; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:56:36 -0800
From: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: Greg Bumgardner <gbumgard@gmail.com>, tlp-interest@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150204155636.GA30450@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20150203004612.5BECA1832B6@rfc-editor.org> <CAJkfEFrnHypEY5qX+ko5TO2N3AGtpYS_2T+iVmWcfVt1Mi-tbg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJkfEFrnHypEY5qX+ko5TO2N3AGtpYS_2T+iVmWcfVt1Mi-tbg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tlp-interest/h-MyzBAuaqXeFjrA36QmXH3gh1Q>
Cc: mboned-ads@tools.ietf.org, "<mboned-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <mboned-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [tlp-interest] Question about 6.c.iii Legend - Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 7450 <draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: tlp-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <tlp-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tlp-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:56:59 -0000
Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:54:14PM -0800, Greg Bumgardner wrote: > All, > [snip] > I do have a question regarding the LPR/copyright declaration. The pre-RFC-5378 > designation was a carry-over from a much older version of the ID document. > The ID was completely re-written in 2011/12 and probably contains very > little, if any, text from the older drafts, going back nearly a decade now. > Can/Should the LPR be changed to TPL 4.0? I don't recall any discussion > regarding the LPR declaration since I began work on the spec as it exists > today. Item 4 on the Copyright FAQ <http://trustee.ietf.org/copyright-faq.html> provides some information about when the 6.c.iii Legend should be included. In addition, we have added <trustees@ietf.org> to this thread in the hopes that they can provide additional guidance. Please let us know if any changes are needed. Thank you, RFC Editor/sg > > Thanks, > > -g.b. > > > > > Updated 2015/02/02 > > > > RFC Author(s): > > -------------- > > > > Instructions for Completing AUTH48 in XML > > > > This is your last chance to make changes to your RFC-to-be: > > draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18.txt. > > Once the document is published as an RFC, we will not make changes. > > Please follow the instructions below to complete the AUTH48 process. > > (For frequently asked questions, please see > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcfaq.html#auth48.) > > > > 1) Review the edited document completely. The files are available here: > > > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7450.txt > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7450-diff.html > > > > We recommend reviewing the entire document, not just the diff file. > > FYI, http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff provides tools to make various > > kinds of diff files. > > > > The placement of page breaks will be handled during the final stages of > > publication (typically post-xml2rfc processing). > > > > 2) Review and resolve (as necessary) any questions raised by the RFC > > Editor. The questions (if any) have been included in the XML file as > > comments marked <!-- [rfced] ... --> and will be sent in a subsequent > > email. > > > > Retrieve the edited XML file here: > > > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7450.xml > > > > (Note that you may need to view the page source to save the file.) > > > > 3) Send us your changes or respond with your approval for publication. > > Please use 'REPLY ALL' so that rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org and the > > parties > > CC'ed on this message receive your response. Note that your document > > will > > not move forward until we have received approvals from each of the > > authors listed on the front page. > > > > If sending changes, please do one of the following: > > > > a. Update the provided XML file, then email us the revised XML file. > > You may use any filename for the revised file; we will rename it > > before posting it. > > > > --OR-- > > > > b. Provide us with an explicit list of changes in this format. > > > > Section # (or indicate Global) > > > > OLD: > > old text > > > > NEW: > > new text > > > > Be sure to pay particular attention to these areas of the document: > > - IANA Considerations updates (if applicable) > > - Contact information > > - Copyright notice and legends (see item 5 for more details) > > > > 4) Review changes submitted by your coauthors (if any). We assume that > > you will speak up if you do not agree with the proposed changes. > > That is, your silence is your assent to changes submitted by your > > coauthors. Note that any changes that are beyond editorial will be > > sent to the relevant body for approval. > > > > 5) Review the copyright notice and legends as defined in RFC 5378 and > > the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP -- > > http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/). > > > > If your document was approved for publication with a pre-RFC-5378 > > copyright notice, we have applied the text from section 6.c.iii of the > > TLP. Please consider whether this text is required (note that the > > 6.c.iii text is not applicable to Alternate Stream RFCs). See item > > 4.5 of the "Copyright FAQ" at http://trustee.ietf.org/faqs.html for > > guidance on whether this text applies to your document. > > > > 6) Please reply, as the document will not be published until we receive > > approvals from each author. The details of the AUTH48 status of your > > document are here: > > > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc7450 > > > > Thank you for your cooperation, > > > > RFC Editor > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC7450 (draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : Automatic Multicast Tunneling > > Author(s) : G. Bumgardner > > WG Chair(s) : Greg Shepherd, Leonard Giuliano > > Area Director(s) : Benoit Claise, Joel Jaeggli > > > > > > > -- > Greg Bumgardner > Eugene, OR ------+ ------+
- [tlp-interest] Question about 6.c.iii Legend - Re… RFC Editor
- Re: [tlp-interest] Question about 6.c.iii Legend … RFC Editor
- Re: [tlp-interest] [Trustees] Question about 6.c.… Jorge Contreras