[tlp-interest] Question about 6.c.iii Legend - Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 7450 <draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 04 February 2015 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4461A8A7B for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:56:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j6R56kT_kdxM for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEE11A8A61 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 6000) id 5B1D718380A; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:56:36 -0800
From: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
To: Greg Bumgardner <gbumgard@gmail.com>, tlp-interest@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150204155636.GA30450@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20150203004612.5BECA1832B6@rfc-editor.org> <CAJkfEFrnHypEY5qX+ko5TO2N3AGtpYS_2T+iVmWcfVt1Mi-tbg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJkfEFrnHypEY5qX+ko5TO2N3AGtpYS_2T+iVmWcfVt1Mi-tbg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tlp-interest/h-MyzBAuaqXeFjrA36QmXH3gh1Q>
Cc: mboned-ads@tools.ietf.org, "<mboned-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <mboned-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [tlp-interest] Question about 6.c.iii Legend - Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 7450 <draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: tlp-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <tlp-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tlp-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:56:59 -0000

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:54:14PM -0800, Greg Bumgardner wrote:
> All,
> 
[snip]

> I do have a question regarding the LPR/copyright declaration. The pre-RFC-5378
> designation was a carry-over from a much older version of the ID document.
> The ID was completely re-written in 2011/12 and probably contains very
> little, if any, text from the older drafts, going back nearly a decade now.
> Can/Should the LPR be changed to TPL 4.0? I don't recall any discussion
> regarding the LPR declaration since I began work on the spec as it exists
> today.

Item 4 on the Copyright FAQ
<http://trustee.ietf.org/copyright-faq.html> provides some information
about when the 6.c.iii Legend should be included. 

In addition, we have added <trustees@ietf.org> to this thread in the
hopes that they can provide additional guidance. 

Please let us know if any changes are needed.

Thank you,
RFC Editor/sg

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -g.b.
> 

> >
> > Updated 2015/02/02
> >
> > RFC Author(s):
> > --------------
> >
> > Instructions for Completing AUTH48 in XML
> >
> > This is your last chance to make changes to your RFC-to-be:
> > draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18.txt.
> > Once the document is published as an RFC, we will not make changes.
> > Please follow the instructions below to complete the AUTH48 process.
> > (For frequently asked questions, please see
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcfaq.html#auth48.)
> >
> > 1) Review the edited document completely.  The files are available here:
> >
> >    http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7450.txt
> >    http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7450-diff.html
> >
> >    We recommend reviewing the entire document, not just the diff file.
> >    FYI, http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff provides tools to make various
> >    kinds of diff files.
> >
> >    The placement of page breaks will be handled during the final stages of
> >    publication (typically post-xml2rfc processing).
> >
> > 2) Review and resolve (as necessary) any questions raised by the RFC
> >    Editor.  The questions (if any) have been included in the XML file as
> >    comments marked <!-- [rfced] ... --> and will be sent in a subsequent
> > email.
> >
> >    Retrieve the edited XML file here:
> >
> >       http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc7450.xml
> >
> >    (Note that you may need to view the page source to save the file.)
> >
> > 3) Send us your changes or respond with your approval for publication.
> >    Please use 'REPLY ALL' so that rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org and the
> > parties
> >    CC'ed on this message receive your response. Note that your document
> > will
> >    not move forward until we have received approvals from each of the
> >    authors listed on the front page.
> >
> >    If sending changes, please do one of the following:
> >
> >    a. Update the provided XML file, then email us the revised XML file.
> >       You may use any filename for the revised file; we will rename it
> >       before posting it.
> >
> >    --OR--
> >
> >    b. Provide us with an explicit list of changes in this format.
> >
> >       Section # (or indicate Global)
> >
> >       OLD:
> >       old text
> >
> >       NEW:
> >       new text
> >
> >    Be sure to pay particular attention to these areas of the document:
> >    - IANA Considerations updates (if applicable)
> >    - Contact information
> >    - Copyright notice and legends (see item 5 for more details)
> >
> > 4) Review changes submitted by your coauthors (if any).  We assume that
> >    you will speak up if you do not agree with the proposed changes.
> >    That is, your silence is your assent to changes submitted by your
> >    coauthors. Note that any changes that are beyond editorial will be
> >    sent to the relevant body for approval.
> >
> > 5) Review the copyright notice and legends as defined in RFC 5378 and
> >    the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP --
> > http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
> >
> >    If your document was approved for publication with a pre-RFC-5378
> >    copyright notice, we have applied the text from section 6.c.iii of the
> >    TLP.  Please consider whether this text is required (note that the
> >    6.c.iii text is not applicable to Alternate Stream RFCs).  See item
> >    4.5 of the "Copyright FAQ" at http://trustee.ietf.org/faqs.html for
> >    guidance on whether this text applies to your document.
> >
> > 6) Please reply, as the document will not be published until we receive
> >    approvals from each author.  The details of the AUTH48 status of your
> >    document are here:
> >
> >    http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc7450
> >
> > Thank you for your cooperation,
> >
> > RFC Editor
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC7450 (draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-18)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title            : Automatic Multicast Tunneling
> > Author(s)        : G. Bumgardner
> > WG Chair(s)      : Greg Shepherd, Leonard Giuliano
> > Area Director(s) : Benoit Claise, Joel Jaeggli
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg Bumgardner
> Eugene, OR















































































































































------+





















------+