Re: [tlp-interest] A clerical correction to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions 5.0

Lars Eggert <> Tue, 07 September 2021 12:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9823A1E91 for <>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 05:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SRPwPSDWLeK8 for <>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 05:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023FC3A1E8F for <>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 05:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:dda5:4290:1153:a43b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF81F600373; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:51:13 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=dkim; t=1631019073; bh=jxa/roFMbO13+EVaIrDTqidGU+1wisnHqlMsW6hFYDw=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=JLenr3s8uHGdqzBWpbl0QfhPRiiNpVAiNQJFV4WJ7EbxuGExPwlyDswjYI6G/Ui/H HfvrgpJffea49IaHwKoJOtRgUazkkmWva0k3GRzfZJHvRVszETg67oc5XRWFcB/tNA JGU6O0L20hE/oKQ/pMR/UaOddjaoTGjTu2zc8aZM=
From: Lars Eggert <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E76917EA-40EB-4479-BDD6-0FCDF0406B77"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.\))
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 15:51:10 +0300
In-Reply-To: <>
To: "John R. Levine" <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
X-MailScanner-ID: BF81F600373.A3079
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [tlp-interest] A clerical correction to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions 5.0
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 12:51:32 -0000


On 2021-9-3, at 16:31, Lars Eggert <> wrote:
> On 2021-9-2, at 4:03, John R. Levine <> wrote:
>> Done, see
> I added some comments.

and some got merged. And all got deleted, even the ones where I asked questions?

Since my question was basically about whether the changed TLP in the Google Doc has *all* the changes highlighted compared to the current TLP, I went ahead and did a diff on the text versions (attached.)

I see three changes:

1. Addition of the note at the beginning describing the license confusion, also highlighted in the Google Doc

2. Several replacements of "Simplified" with "Revised". The Google Doc only highlights one such change.

3. A change of to, which is not highlighted in the Google Doc.

So the Google Doc is not in fact useful to understand all the changes that were made.