[tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Proposed Amendment to IETF IPMC Bylaws
Glenn Deen <gdeen@ietf-trust.org> Mon, 06 October 2025 19:37 UTC
Return-Path: <gdeen@ietf-trust.org>
X-Original-To: tlp-interest@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tlp-interest@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0ACD6E2BBC9 for <tlp-interest@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ietf-trust-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wkOiTLYqNjwb for <tlp-interest@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 12:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x934.google.com (mail-ua1-x934.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::934]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335006E2BA95 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 12:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x934.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-930989f9f81so41422241.3 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ietf-trust-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1759779427; x=1760384227; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=L5WRwhdOQXb0fKhbaZmxbAq43F7u97g/FkJrX2tYa0g=; b=hfHAwmsITIdN2TWD9P++JjamtJHuny9zTxtgkbFxyqn5t4rlzjSeMmJNPF4d+Wtua5 HbvN2Plaqz7Zz9uxW3yrYx2Y+2XsM2YrU92W/CUKrhXTuSGcYWUfu3IKRviR87vl6M9j Bm2vyTnqw6fN9n0H3W+RSyBH4im18mfeB3nRAhPPHRA6mD1jQt+4l9lc/dFk0FcSjEHk IUhJ91LeCIo/Bwy6LO02W0MitAoH4X8zB65Lt39UxsF6QVINjglqqQoEV/EvMh8KIRQW YA1wGXBghmwqxWuBpaljSxz8XjMjWctoDnwHPtAcAz2h0HLlHK4js58QtXHkA1SjFYYF OZ1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759779427; x=1760384227; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=L5WRwhdOQXb0fKhbaZmxbAq43F7u97g/FkJrX2tYa0g=; b=Uhe511kxCl/R07eMYA7kUylnD+9KbJ1cXh3xVUXHZWsIpeQeek/TIFDQ2LCSEosYNm kIRdMEqPTWqegt2zohKEXH0fUC/peCGRDHKEbfD1+yosAR2pyOgILX/OVRr0DWLVA304 4sUBma+lOo0y1GXRtFOKPCIPowCusoEseITiMq06FDUH6MTGe6RobM2P2PcI3UuBY5Dc QEc0JBZzwp9MWj03izIxodT9w5fJrbt5pVn2NdExYASIv81z/HYmamcJkSTHCl0jGtLP DGFLr6OIYuyDH2LgupWrjGxqW0EdxjN2ssuoJWkBy3N9VbPp6Tv6AaaduCiPSaKvxzEU Ahtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEZ79NttMhWRu8P99gNovC3V0Z++LWyPXF9GX67PkhGRTzUnv7 t207SGLTjJEE2pDfNzxAmvKGO2Ok8Q2DRCIEbwx9JVnNQkrsS/UBLMqBElCxrGix4umgyZf8NuV ZvpnqV+KCGQqYnuEJHjL8P7kMoPdABGon3Hk7kIB+jb+DB0dG8Hjb0IM=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu1hqaxYavwt40KFC50vHIk+vRU/ib9xqeVdRDU4V2j2YjyvcOrpKG8tlgM8p8 2G8He3CTD5E16BBE2QkRFKMGT5t/EwL0iR7/HOt/eJf6j4+AUKJkRYcGDNYO6tiVG/v8PW5Ex3F KcQto2e37lNsxFN85mCLnCdsqPgZTuHgNhO7oiSuezvPJR7nlATNrMS5m2UooNksTduB+XTdfR7 Iugt6bzy3ak0LAQ9gYDoqidnBnmAUxx6RI3Jq4d3w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGYIGZmxgh+n2mVi/SWqTGY07RsiTWoe2sGu2/k5SdEN/68WAVY5sdM4qpgx/TCBXljnuDcKRdXdxqhRZFNQrc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:c93:b0:522:4c98:17e with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-5d41d00126cmr5029351137.4.1759779427465; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <175952451873.3281138.13288864131593743590@dt-datatracker-6c6cdf7f94-h6rnn> <MN2PR17MB4031180F1F09A60574584887CDE2A@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <BY5PR17MB402033EC77FA4A5365C5C5F8CDE3A@BY5PR17MB4020.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR17MB402033EC77FA4A5365C5C5F8CDE3A@BY5PR17MB4020.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
From: Glenn Deen <gdeen@ietf-trust.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:36:30 -0700
X-Gm-Features: AS18NWDh_COAWjkt1Ri07TpBZ0N2dUgc2ge-qGDOfqsyVU8OzH8NF5GV7pLkP5Q
Message-ID: <CAFPasSDrdMsGj6xHO5ZOnTtuMhZ+3nUbCoM6O=SZxNyot4wv-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-ID-Hash: QEP4CJ2VUTCFYC6H3EELSEPHRCMR5EDP
X-Message-ID-Hash: QEP4CJ2VUTCFYC6H3EELSEPHRCMR5EDP
X-MailFrom: gdeen@ietf-trust.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 3.3.9rc6
CC: "tlp-interest@ietf.org" <tlp-interest@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Proposed Amendment to IETF IPMC Bylaws
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <tlp-interest.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tlp-interest/kpIE54v725xzMSiiibh88Iy4aKc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tlp-interest>
List-Help: <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tlp-interest-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tlp-interest-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tlp-interest-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Rich, If you use the Redline link in the email you'll find the changes highlighted in yellow markings instead of "[ xxx ]" to show the changes. The summary of changes is in the original email, broken out in the three types groupings. But a quick guide is that except for the changes to replace "IETF Trust" to "IETF IPMC" and "Trustee" to "Director" and a "Trust" to "Corporation" mentions, all the other changes for IANA topics are ALL NEW Text additions and did not replace any existing text. regards Glenn On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 12:26 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz= 40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Resending > > From: Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> > Date: Sunday, October 5, 2025 at 1:38 PM > To: tlp-interest@ietf.org <tlp-interest@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: October 2025 Notice of Proposed Amendment to IETF IPMC Bylaws > > I am used to seeing “redline” used to describe a document where the old > words are struck out and the new ones are in [brackets like this] or other > indication. Can you post a “fixed” redline version? > > Can you include a summary of changes? > > > From: The IETF Trust <ietf-trust@ietf.org> > Date: Friday, October 3, 2025 at 4:49 PM > To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org> > Cc: tlp-interest@ietf.org <tlp-interest@ietf.org> > Subject: October 2025 Notice of Proposed Amendment to IETF IPMC Bylaws > > !-------------------------------------------------------------------| > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside your organization. > |-------------------------------------------------------------------! > > October 2025 Notice of Proposed Amendment to IETF IPMC Bylaws > > The IETF Intellectual Property Management Corporation (IPMC) Directors are > considering adopting a proposed set of amendments to the IETF IPMC bylaws. > > As required by the IETF IPMC bylaws, these amendments are undergoing a 60 > day notice following the requirements of the current IETF IPMC bylaws > “Article XII Amendments” before the IETF IPMC Directors can vote to adopt > any proposed amendments. > > This 60-day notice is being sent to bodies that appoint the 5 IETF IPMC > Directors (IETF Trustees) - the IESG, IETF NOMCOM, ISOC Board of Trustees, > and announced more broadly through the IETF-Announcements list. > > The proposed amended bylaws, dated October 2 2025, have been published by > the IPMC in both redline and in clean version along with the current active > IPMC bylaws on the IPMC web site ( > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf-ipm.org/__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKUDeTIWQR$ > ) > > Links to IPMC bylaws: > Current Active Bylaws: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf-ipm.org/uploads/IPMC-bylaws.pdf__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKUHxFqTFX$ > Redline Proposed Bylaws: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf-ipm.org/uploads/Oct25_Proposed_Amended_Bylaws_REDLINE.pdf__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKUNKp29ti$ > Clean Proposed Bylaws: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf-ipm.org/uploads/Oct25_Proposed_Amended_Bylaws_CLEAN.pdf__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKULuPKesN$ > > > Summary of Proposed Amendments: > > The Proposed Amendments cover three purposes: > > 1. Final Corporate Name > ------------------------------- > Update the corporation’s name in the bylaws to reflect the final approved > name of the organization. At the time of original filing the bylaws, > continuing to use IETF Trust as the corporate name had been approved by the > State of Delaware, but this was later reversed resulting in the final name > choice being the IETF Intellectual Property Management Corporation. > > 1. All uses of the name IETF Trust as the organization name in the bylaws > have been changed to IETF Intellectual Property Management Corporation or > IETF IPMC, reflecting the final registered name of the IETF Trust’s > successor. > > 2. The term Trustee has been changed to Director. > > 2. ARTICLE Re-Numbering & Internal Cross-Reference Validation > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Correcting a misnumbering of Article sections in the late half of the > bylaws and internal cross reference citations, which are believed to have > occurred due to import and export across document formats (DOCX/Google > Docs) and interactions with automated numbering along with manual fix-ups > during formatting. All Articles and citations have been reviewed and > revalidated, correcting as appropriate. > > 3. The current IPMC bylaws have misnumbered ARTICLES starting at Article > VI. The Amended bylaw proposal has had all ARTICLE numbering reviewed and > correctly renumbered, including clause labels. > > 4. Related to the renumbering of Articles and automated numbers, all cross > references and citations in the bylaws to Sections and Articles have been > reviewed, validated and corrected as appropriate. > > 3. NEW language specific to the IANA IPR held by the IETF Trust > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > In addition to the IETF IP Assets held by the IETF Trust, the IETF Trust > also holds Trademarks and DNS Domain name IP Assets for the IANA. These > assets were transferred to the IETF Trust under a set of agreements [3] ( > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://trustee.ietf.org/iana-ipr/__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKUH-o2TWD$ > ) between the IETF Trust and the Protocols, Names and Numbers communities > and ICANN in 2016. > > These Proposed Amendments add new language into the IETF IPMC Bylaws to > recognize the help IANA IPR and the Community Agreement [4] role with > regard to it. > > 5. Add to Section 3.16 extending the annual reporting requirement to the > IETF to also include annual reporting to the CCG. > > 6. Amend the bylaws to add new language to Article IV: ASSETS to > recognize the held IANA IPR assets and the role of the Community Agreement > with regard to these assets. > > 7. The proposed amended bylaws now contain the new section 4.10 IANA IPR > containing terms from the triggered Community Agreement Section 4.4. > > Background: Under the terms of the Community Agreement [4] with the IETF > Trust, the Community Agreement clause 4.4, the IANA CCG (Cross Community > Group) has submitted the request to add IANA IPR Terms which asks additions > to the IETF Trust Agreement specific for IANA IPR. As the IETF IPMC is > the successor to the IETF Trust the IPMC Directors are hereby applying > this request to the IPMC Bylaws instead of the IETF Trust Agreement. > > > > > > IETF IPMC 60 Day Bylaw Notice Amendment Process: > > This notice is being sent to the IESG, IAB, IETF NOMCOM, ISOC BoT and to > the IETF-Announcement list. The IETF IPMC Directors will hold a vote on > adoption no earlier than 60 days from the publication of this notice. > > Given that no structural or organizational changes are being made, this is > following the required 60 day notice process and not a broader consultation > such as was done around the IETF Trust restructuring. > > Submitting Comments: > > Concerns or objections to adopting any portion of these amendments, should > be communicated to the IPMC Directors within the 60 day notice period. > Such comments may be sent directly to the IPMC Directors ( > trustees@ietf.org) or to the public list TLP-INTEREST@IETF.ORG. > > Helpful Links: > > [1] Current IETF IPMC Bylaws > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf-ipm.org/uploads/IPMC-bylaws.pdf__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKUHxFqTFX$ > > [2] Proposed Amended IPMC Bylaw drafts > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf-ipm.org/uploads/Oct25_Proposed_Amended_Bylaws_REDLINE.pdf__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKUNKp29ti$ > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf-ipm.org/uploads/Oct25_Proposed_Amended_Bylaws_CLEAN.pdf__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKULuPKesN$ > > [3] IANA IPR Agreements from 2016 with IETF Trust > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://trustee.ietf.org/iana-ipr/__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKUH-o2TWD$ > > [4] IANA IPR Community Agreement > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://trustee.ietf.org/wp-content/uploads/Community-Agreement-2016-09-30-Executed.pdf__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKUGjbTkIJ$ > > > This is also being announced on the IETF IPMC web site > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf-ipm.org/__;!!GjvTz_vk!X3SbCkS5lDsoE-B_ajosnVm-s1ME_gXKveggN2fN9eCBrdq-nBkNMijkqN6N6kNGCT5f0ZLKUDeTIWQR$ > --- > > Comments may be directed to TLP-Interest@ietf.org. > > -- > Glenn Deen, IETF IPMC President on behalf of the IPMC Board > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list -- ietf-announce@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-announce-leave@ietf.org > _______________________________________________ > tlp-interest mailing list -- tlp-interest@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tlp-interest-leave@ietf.org >
- [tlp-interest] October 2025 Notice of Proposed Am… The IETF Trust
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Salz, Rich
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Jay Daley
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Brian E Carpenter
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Russ Housley
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Jay Daley
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Russ Housley
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Jay Daley
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Russ Housley
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Glenn Deen
- [tlp-interest] Re: October 2025 Notice of Propose… Salz, Rich