IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tlp-interest] Proposed Policy on Rights in IANA Parameter Registry Data

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D21B3A1A7E for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:31:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vuVev0CPoQ-b for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 438403A2C38 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:22:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4XMo-1kMZlv1l0e-00ykv0 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:22:51 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:22:51 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: "tlp-interest@ietf.org" <tlp-interest@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <88314195.13998.1605115371103@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <1574064611.80698.1600659049835@email.ionos.com>
References: <1574064611.80698.1600659049835@email.ionos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:PHxse+5LWn65EwMtTgpc6zk0A42NjSu4oV9MTDsxIu08lRyy+vV 37wIEcz44m0XQN6mBuSAJJDMeasVAOtGDRQeBiRLZOxuXMrUpermhkdc1HypYL6RuoK0Prd dGQO3Yn07LOTVL1SVJw+775NiwmOCXGIH4IlyrTYWUW08MAER1GTa4fLJuqksSterC4Nw7X tkGZQjgC+jBEQUVMyBImA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:3bihjWsILe4=:NoZ9bh2Ti+8r0G+w6OVPhv 6QOTIur6jQDPByQhpS11iP+GhqUarzQgA1XVyApUaD6qr/jhm+96n61lUSSjdwtdYf/qaWDBN r1r8KjNJkErQmof9knmn05ypJ5NFA1Bf5yoMBokCdGoMjghAP960wTJjhMPIMEQnJgx2fZsei R7TyBnp9k2x9FlOpkCG6znaKaUCjDLfOki7q0yEnsst4WbuoLkErpWl0wwRUCxvo/zcojEqRC /ncD11UnCcYH1Ss8FhXO9nPS6r00wKhbre4ULzQmRX6LlXeusaQPF251tIan1vlAZJcpqvC0B b2S1vWsmNQX0zDsShredGaA5Ww2MB4sNCKdaWyjgIZps4lSu2d2Xxe1tALHRiCIfAyTZFudF4 u6VNHeAEwFzBs4l7qG4QRog1ljdmDltT/ZgkGsodMf2dnsok+NRoQ8/VGyi2K/HN2MomGT7Fb RIK47YEw5w==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tlp-interest/mpKWEz05OXc-OtQjli31ymu1g0s>
Subject: Re: [tlp-interest] Proposed Policy on Rights in IANA Parameter Registry Data
X-BeenThere: tlp-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <tlp-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tlp-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:31:45 -0000

> On 09/20/2020 11:30 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Glen, 
> >[GD] I’ll add to what John said, that it was IANA that first brought the situation to the Trust’s attention, 
> >and we discussed this approach them before moving forward with the consultation with the broader community.  
> >The Trustees intention is that this gets as many eyes looking at this as reasonably possible.
> 
> For those eyeballs, has there been or will there be an email sent out to anyone who has an email listed in on of those registries?  I think even just the provision URI scheme listings have fifty or more different emails listed.
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email