Re: [Tls-reg-review] Early code points for ECH

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Tue, 26 May 2020 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604A83A0B9D; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=XCnpn4cA; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=D5x+NnUN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qD_x35ycZrUY; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6C63A0B80; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3635C0043; Tue, 26 May 2020 18:25:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 May 2020 18:25:25 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=kzYINXNZlY06NCs61s6cmJFFq2NL nIziuxVb2clOXxw=; b=XCnpn4cAm6V3BE+0WIAE8yJYcgU0yy/uzOKCK7r4Bu3/ AI66cHAj29CE2b2UP/NNtIw2WnP0Qj2c08AcvuZupcbF6dPz0//mBPLIs+yBFm9m U4fZNuz4XwNUfbSv7svAm3dGfFWDrtwN+xhjGi/PBvUYU4XyUr8vDO2M6tFfgoLk FFp2CLqdPKYwIO0Uug4uEgD7LeuWAjj03KD8IGdIkTNahSW58bpr1napf6b30c9F q5NR113xV8J5+nx4YzEkbwi9FHrTO9+du/0OEIABtfKqqwwSqVXZ6N2myogoOjKY q/ZpkATbfP4DjuXqFaLNDWMEY4hZTG5pHOCriyEl0g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=kzYINX NZlY06NCs61s6cmJFFq2NLnIziuxVb2clOXxw=; b=D5x+NnUNUrw0+43fdCiFEw IIQA+HoEYd13b8zqrBNgWUWKR3IH4Rw0sBjR0J4oFbf++CGbOAZpJOtlYLq03UzF LJPffisLzVYapsVJMeCSE37WDm3P6Hg8LTkb8Cwf16I/ePXV+/Exy5+B6SQs0nDZ Ug6GqpVMUg8ICJ2h4s0EjSRJzEcHEQVk2kBRfMJ56em7VWdK5p89QcsM1vKf0HSM u3xf1VqFUevX175lLBlQKMpuhBL7SqNNC30mVlW6VhfVLg+ia6IQ67CmP3R9gZxy OI9BGC3/YFcJnywd3+oqVJ8J0oFzltx3pImhUuHbgiib6pqo9Tv/UyhmkCRV1fdQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:VZfNXph_z5u9yMTCEALzxjw2Q29zYXHl7nF0NU91KiTnP-NKiQ2smQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddvfedgtdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdevhhhr ihhsthhophhhvghrucghohhougdfuceotggrfieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvth eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudffiedtuddttefggeefkeegvdekledvieeitdejteet uedvjeevleelleettdehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomheptggrfieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:VZfNXuD_EXy8FhdNCXKlyjkOXHK3C_hjYk0M9BTxjMQ2291PQWYk6A> <xmx:VZfNXpGKbRkkx174yCbIdy-cTrve8D64-rwdRJfZwfaehOun6OUMqg> <xmx:VZfNXuSxsf4ucySIBb93ACttFZGh--rOIxBmMYxfjPC4-ncvOSHtPQ> <xmx:VZfNXrtOYrfI5WCIWTg0uXNOKsihAhAE8Bz_VfkjxIjo_YEj-mp3VA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1B71C3C00A1; Tue, 26 May 2020 18:25:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-488-g9249dd4-fm-20200522.001-g9249dd48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <685f0d09-ba06-4887-b039-5ba87b2271e2@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200526222155.GV58497@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <f8a52d53-9eee-4545-8e51-239a1113d7ca@www.fastmail.com> <20200526222155.GV58497@kduck.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 15:24:38 -0700
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: TLS Chairs <tls-chairs@ietf.org>, "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/8__5C00gzStccBhIrvcZ5rgCFU0>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Early code points for ECH
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 22:25:36 -0000

That's a good question. It seems we should have a documented policy or strategy for "extension experiments." (If there is one, I've either not seen it or [more likely] forgotten about it!)

On Tue, May 26, 2020, at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:44:25PM -0700, Christopher Wood wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > I'd like to kick off the early codepoint allocation process for ECH. We have two extensions that need codepoints. Based on the existing registry, I chose the next two unassigned values and proposed them in this PR:
> 
> Not really relevant to the current request, but I wonder whether the
> experts have opinions on sequential allocation vs. random allocation.
> 
> -Ben
>