Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for SIP
Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 01 May 2021 15:15 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2F13A1E25
for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2021 08:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id oIi25PHM77zN for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 1 May 2021 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E22C3A1E23
for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 May 2021 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id n127so711592wmb.5
for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 May 2021 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=8oUa1s5zA0CX/HGL4NWhAglNX7uce9vaN8xNk1AGFo4=;
b=NxGqhQcTuNoeCoAhM1cNLOGNfUP1125Uexiw5FBKGrrxRXreq4mMTwT/QSJ5iTITJI
nyrIgOcxHLBqxifqWdl+YGXgHhIdcevKeTAb9DJRZncGQbA/+jXIK9YvrUkK2Wkccfp0
RSjc5Lr//IwZZf6Cqlza773fmcGv8IFfvMInvvMtJ9QxCmy/FHwopVE3yXf42x92hhCU
oQz3HEuPjebGE0BgOHCIgpxEzYGRJ2dUcpClu70jmEHKeRaX/VShjBmUb4Pac3z/E5hf
GmZeahnbkEhdvyyoXjQ/GYx7/HjBW3vxLoCQX/j7bLSBtjaE3RbtCaN25ZjSjrNdiwaU
NsPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=8oUa1s5zA0CX/HGL4NWhAglNX7uce9vaN8xNk1AGFo4=;
b=bNfPuCFcVc57nqksrpq/tGWGfRtXkdej6KuouaUJX/uL6iGaBpyD+C4vdChPRJZC33
++ey1Vfnu2fQ+UewKsyDDFe25dHKacX23LYX8HvqLNBc/tyuaeZfWz810bOIAYcGfZJG
oQ+r1BwqJT/b9YSTKz+ALyl8qKaZHYynbI5Z1EtDylOVaZAGy+KZuK3jlfM5YyELUDna
uQnerrYurUDwGHyD3cMY0EmkvxgurMX1AkmRFnxD/tTvkLh4TUX4oegvOvWm7JmA42Mj
wqhbFiv095BsjSRRQv5mm+5RQxdARkKPe34RDQicOLyjJDxWsU+KAweccoWvPo9iqytu
jrSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531G9Q8ww8XA0LMUJ1zPnObX06tfRpNt92cfDxj9vIOOAf1tDmkn
6TiFyZ1GNClUAyYQ7n/vgTo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQjuYF62nH04HNsdvIU1Oy5LqWCsOHVlouwOZlVsKOStzX5kEq2B8W3RG2rg0HeTQSEAEv0w==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:19cc:: with SMTP id
u12mr22873986wmq.171.1619882151728;
Sat, 01 May 2021 08:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([46.120.57.183])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm7187983wrr.63.2021.05.01.08.15.50
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sat, 01 May 2021 08:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <289CC988-26CA-4FA5-A311-70EA04713678@akamai.com>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 18:15:49 +0300
Cc: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>,
"tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9DF82E49-689F-4093-AC2F-DD2CD6C96443@gmail.com>
References: <14F42417-364C-47CE-8943-6BEFD902906F@edvina.net>
<289CC988-26CA-4FA5-A311-70EA04713678@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/BxOz3Xvr19lRo36MfQHfMUGpwJE>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for SIP
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>,
<mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>,
<mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 15:15:59 -0000
Is RFC 3261 a valid reference? It’s valid for SIP, but doesn’t describe using ALPN. In fact, what it says about TLS is that by default, proxies should be listening on port 5061 for TLS, not sharing some common port with other services. Is there some document that talks about sharing a port between SIP and other services? Yoav > On 30 Apr 2021, at 18:21, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > This looks good to me. Will need Yoav or Nick to also approve. > > On 4/30/21, 3:12 AM, "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> wrote: > > I would like to register a TLS ALPN registry entry for the Session Initiation Protocol according to the following entry: > > Protocol: SIP > Identification Sequence: > 0x73 0x69 0x70 (“sip") > Reference: [RFC3261] > > Best regards, > /Olle E. Johansson > _______________________________________________ > tls-reg-review mailing list > tls-reg-review@ietf.org > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review__;!!GjvTz_vk!BzhIvT8_gOqJ8H95ghJps9NOZ-nnsQ6GnSGICKr3XFzpOHVoa0Zkn-6s6p0K$ > > _______________________________________________ > tls-reg-review mailing list > tls-reg-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review
- [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for SIP Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for S… Olle E. Johansson