Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Emu] [IANA #1264437] expert review for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types (tls-parameters)

Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com> Mon, 23 January 2023 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542EDC14CE4E for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 12:53:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8pCSFm57tZsi for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 12:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52FF1C151531 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 12:52:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id y1so7522046wru.2 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 12:52:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i4IMJBmfU1Kyc+/7/3llajnoexMLaXQyGHvDytGL+b4=; b=xIdmQ+1YGwQE4R9Q79K0Iv9odbNIieIx4MFMu8Fon7sQVqusaUsO4pe3CARp/qy8Zu WaEGmrtREVOkQ+AwTKAJpxllfbXUzj2wHA4f4W5dgPWKV6wEXqvqBCJY4kRcguG6p+Y9 MPyAgOpoXYmuoE+PZvmfJ46oaVCbObt1XsgrE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=i4IMJBmfU1Kyc+/7/3llajnoexMLaXQyGHvDytGL+b4=; b=NX7HvIxyOsn7P9QJ1xY03Gsi/+Hs1ztinssnGNqss2eyUkPKyaV/OizLtyYyPGy80I 6pzJ7w2WCM8tSRFXO0XdCGoleyoQbZQFeaZKX56YptkYVeD7UKr9T4aV98gQRnf3v9qL FEt2PjaJIwGsZ7FfsbRczdPbUa0tpmlQW3XNqN1ftCA9cVZKu0mI4nRs3MKzy62rs1N4 hcOyQU9RrdUMPoFzx1oMKCh3ZYoaAJREHY+rp8DKKGr3yBZTQxiNLf+npjiNNr4X8aFA 4C7w2KdMoWxD8qqij83y7XcS8B8WLbXXF7xoDNa1R1j+NrBBYvbv3fP4co0hVhBp3X7M H7GQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kq3jO2Np6iWHS4c1zI4il/tyg7icmzCDM2KWgVsGEVMjmC7J77e hiEfWRva7B0XXdq2Ib5f33UQZ4DSMfXB73LYAJ8Hqjck31UsHA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtr86xoKVQE/NKJR5EqE5H2XEhTsJjB3OfI+4TH/yhkMg6Yi2yK4U4wAqRd2j40Pgy+IzMRvamTt3HISJ6OaTQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a81:0:b0:2bc:26a:5d5b with SMTP id o1-20020a5d4a81000000b002bc026a5d5bmr1104732wrq.296.1674507142541; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 12:52:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-1264437@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-49710-1674071725-1336.1264437-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-56953-1674079809-1714.1264437-9-0@icann.org> <349F6743-C4F4-40EC-9FAB-862BA3E01932@akamai.com> <BF3968F6-2341-4513-AF56-E7A16613D037@deployingradius.com> <9E0B3E66-DDB9-4CBF-98A0-7B30A0F5093B@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <9E0B3E66-DDB9-4CBF-98A0-7B30A0F5093B@akamai.com>
From: Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:52:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFDDyk-3M13se4dO9+dhnr2tg+vecpvHx-gXnkKZyjOG7rvJkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>, "drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org" <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>, "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>, "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000067e49405f2f49315"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/CBnJ9E_2ZMZKAJ3hG2eN3Qle4WI>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Emu] [IANA #1264437] expert review for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types (tls-parameters)
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 20:53:49 -0000

Hi Alan,

I second Rich's approval.

Nick

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:26 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> >At this point, I don't think so. We have implementations which use these
> values.
>
> That's fine, interop over all.
>
> > Does the space cause a problem? I don't recall seeing guidance on TLS
> exporter labels which suggest that spaces should be avoided.
>
> There isn't guidance.  IT's just that I noticed that the internal
> whitespace can lead to confusion, such as mine.
>
> You've addressed my concerns.  I approve this.  Still need Yoav or Nick to
> agree.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tls-reg-review mailing list
> tls-reg-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review
>