Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1140715] Fwd: Application for the TLS code points (draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc)

[Yoav Nir <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Amanda.

I don’t see much difference there, so I think starting with 0x0704 should be fine.

> On 17 Apr 2019, at 0:21, Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Yoav,
> 
> Which values should we assign for these four registrations? There are several separate ranges of available values:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xhtml#tls-signaturescheme <https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xhtml#tls-signaturescheme>
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
> On Tue Apr 16 19:36:57 2019, [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Rich, Nick and I have discussed this, and we approve this request.
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10>
>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc- <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc->
>> 10>
>> 
>> Please let us know if there are any problems with it.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Yoav
>> (on behalf of the TLS registry review team)
>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>> From: Wang Haiguang <[e-mail]>
>>> Subject: RE: [Tls-reg-review] Application for the TLS code points
>>> Date: 16 April 2019 at 12:44:43 GMT+3
>>> To: Nick Sullivan <[e-mail]>, Yoav Nir
>>> <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, Sean Turner
>>> <[e-mail]>
>>> 
>>> Dear Yoav and Sullivan
>>> 
>>> I have uploaded the version of TLS-IBC draft version 10 to the IETF
>>> data tracker for code points application. The version is the same as
>>> the one attached in the previous email.
>>> 
>>> Following is link to the uploaded draft:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10.pdf
>>> <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc- <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc->
>>> 10.pdf>
>>> 
>>> May I know what other procedure I should do for the application the
>>> code points as required in the draft?
>>> 
>>> Thanks very for the help.
>>> 
>>> Regards.
>>> 
>>> Haiguang
>>> 
>>> From: Nick Sullivan [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 8:24 AM
>>> To: Yoav Nir <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: Wang Haiguang <[e-mail]>; tls-reg-
>>> [e-mail]; Sean Turner <[e-mail]>
>>> Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Application for the TLS code points
>>> 
>>> Looks good to me too.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 2:08 PM Yoav Nir <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>> wrote:
>>> Looks good to me.
>>> 
>>> Yoav
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 15 Apr 2019, at 4:26, Wang Haiguang
>>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Yoav
>>> 
>>> Thanks very much for your kindness.
>>> 
>>> I have updated the draft by copying the text you provided in the last
>>> email  into the IANA section.
>>> Please help to check whether the content in the IANA section is
>>> appropriate or not.
>>> 
>>> If it is okay, I will upload this version as a version 10 to the IETF
>>> data tracker.
>>> 
>>> Best regards.
>>> 
>>> Haiguang
>>> 
>>> From: Yoav Nir [mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>]
>>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 5:58 PM
>>> To: Wang Haiguang <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>>
>>> Cc: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; Sean
>>> Turner <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Application for the TLS code points
>>> 
>>> Hi, Haiguang.
>>> 
>>> This is still not right. The word “reserved” in IANA registries means
>>> code points that are not to be assigned. For example, in this
>>> registry a lot of ranges are reserved for backward compatibility..
>>> 
>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls- <https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls->
>>> parameters.xml#tls-signaturescheme
>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls- <https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls->
>>> parameters.xml#tls-parameters-16>
>>> 
>>> The way such IANA Considerations sections are usually phrased are
>>> something like the following:
>>> 
>>> IANA is requested to assign 4 code points from the TLS
>>> SignatureScheme registry with the following descriptions:
>>> eccsi_sha256
>>> iso_ibs1
>>> iso_ibs2
>>> iso_chinese_ibs
>>> 
>>> For all of these entries the Recommended field should be N, and the
>>> Reference field should be this document.
>>> 
>>> Feel free to copy the above text.
>>> 
>>> Yoav
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 12 Apr 2019, at 11:05, Wang Haiguang
>>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Yoav,
>>> 
>>> I have updated the TLS-IBC draft, which is version -09, and has been
>>> uploaded to the data tracker.
>>> Following is the link to the updated draft:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-09.txt <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-09.txt>
>>> <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc- <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc->
>>> 09.txt>.
>>> 
>>> In the IANA section, I have removed the request for ECCSI OID as it
>>> has already been assigned.
>>> For the code point, I added following content:
>>> 
>>> The following TLS code points are required to be assigned:
>>> 
>>> - Signature Scheme Registry: signature algorithm for
>>> eccsi_with_sha256, iso_ibs1, iso_ibs2, iso_chinese_ibs are required
>>> to be reserved.
>>> 
>>> Please let me know your comments.
>>> 
>>> Best regards.
>>> 
>>> Haiguang
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: Wang Haiguang
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 4:34 PM
>>> To: Yoav Nir <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>>
>>> Cc: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; Sean
>>> Turner <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>>
>>> Subject: RE: [Tls-reg-review] Application for the TLS code points
>>> 
>>> Dear Yoav,
>>> 
>>> Thanks very much for the comments.
>>> 
>>> We will update the draft according to your suggestion and will upload
>>> the IETF data tracker soon.
>>> 
>>> Previously we have submit a version 9, but it seems that version is
>>> not the data tracker, so I am going to change the version number to 9
>>> for next submission instead of a 10.
>>> 
>>> Best regards.
>>> 
>>> Haiguang
>>> From: Yoav Nir [[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>]
>>> Sent: Thursday, 28 March, 2019 1:03:32 PM
>>> To: Wang Haiguang
>>> Cc: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; Sean
>>> Turner
>>> Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Application for the TLS code points
>>> 
>>> Hi, Haiguang
>>> 
>>> We’ve discussed it, and you can get your code points.  However, there
>>> are a few things you need to do first:
>>> The current draft in the datatracker is version -08, not -10. That
>>> version requests just one code point assignment, not 4.  Please
>>> submit the updated draft.
>>> Even in the PDF version of the draft, the four code points appear in
>>> section 4, but they do not appear in section 8 (IANA Considerations).
>>> The IANA considerations section is confusing.  It states that IANA is
>>> asked to assign an OID, and in the next bullet point says that this
>>> OID has already been assigned.  It’s not clear to me, and it won’t be
>>> clear to IANA what you want them to do.
>>> 
>>> So please get back to us after you submit a revised draft with a
>>> fixed section 8, and we will instruct IANA to make the assignment.
>>> 
>>> Hope this helps.
>>> 
>>> Yoav
>>> (on behalf of the TLS review team)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 26 Mar 2019, at 9:58, Wang Haiguang
>>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Rich, Yoav and Nick
>>> 
>>> This is Haiguang Wang from Huawei.
>>> 
>>> Currently we are working on a personal draft named as draft-wang-tls-
>>> raw-public-key-with-ibc-10.
>>> We have made a presentation in IETF 104 yesterday. Attached is the
>>> our presentation slides and the draft that will be upload to the IETF
>>> meeting.
>>> 
>>> We need 4 code points for four IBS signature algorithms, so please
>>> review and let us know whether we can get the four code points for
>>> implementation and testing of the protocol.
>>> 
>>> enum {
>>> ...
>>> /* IBS ECCSI signature algorithm */
>>> eccsi_sha256 (TBD),
>>> iso_ibs1 (TBD),
>>> iso_ibs2 (TBD),
>>> iso_chinese_ibs (TBD),
>>> /* Reserved Code Points */
>>> private_use (0xFE00..0xFFFF),
>>> (0xFFFF)
>>> } SignatureScheme;
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards.
>>> 
>>> Haiguang
>>> <draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10.pdf><slides-104-TLS-raw-
>>> public-key-IBC-10.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>> tls-reg-review mailing list
>>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>
>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>>
>>> 
>>> <draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10.pdf>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tls-reg-review mailing list
>>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>
>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>>