Re: [Tls-reg-review] Request to code point on new drafts

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBC91200C1 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2iyKFa8PNLuJ for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85091200B2 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x7KCRSZr010731; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:32:04 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Eh80LFmRegVzJUCg5b20jRG8e83N7k3kkWLZXIefN5c=; b=oN5CekkfhTUJwQ06w9/GUoe+OFHHICcEWyioQQrVbfVmm822kMZDEdhIx0u0dkX5s7Yn B26wNFtfcQt2ARl168sMio/fqaH83aAI9ntMp4s0RjSUOpxbHzN0rTIhJ941gRULsmQN 1M8ABy0OQegjtHgYKYsNs+Vf4AN5RROlN5b+2/5hCrFhx9W5Wxn7a8aMkkqoIleXJa3Y Y//olOsgNkxskad7jx+CYzmL1quR6HpdY13Hq+oaZng0hMBxC4QV18j5kYl3CjoymiVF NFTsUiviKAtkNXB32gCVUMMmeTq9MvR0SsNqr6z8ryJwth5ZwMrJ64wGu+579FKFTnPx 6w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ue9mhn8ff-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:32:04 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7KCVocK014782; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:32:03 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2uecwvdymy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:32:02 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:32:01 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:32:02 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@alipay.com>
CC: "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Tls-reg-review] Request to code point on new drafts
Thread-Index: AQHVVpGCQQnTjmS59EmsAvDOZcSWRqcCnq0AgABEp4CAARYQgA==
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:32:01 +0000
Message-ID: <2AE00299-0FC6-4BF1-A9BB-D91082D2B5BC@akamai.com>
References: <EF11BCB9-024B-49BC-8279-AF575C250E54@alipay.com> <54CFCCD3-4173-4052-B3DE-E5880BD59120@akamai.com> <21DAA117-C545-485F-9FBE-879437D52F84@alipay.com>
In-Reply-To: <21DAA117-C545-485F-9FBE-879437D52F84@alipay.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.34.19]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2AE002990FC64BF1A9BBD91082D2B5BCakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-20_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908200131
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:5.22.84,1.0.8 definitions=2019-08-20_05:2019-08-19,2019-08-20 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1906280000 definitions=main-1908200130
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/EkFv-14MI0Lv6UWyJBehTkbyNJI>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Request to code point on new drafts
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:32:10 -0000

An early codepoint request means the numbers are “reserved” and when the RFC gets published, they are formally assigned. This is often done for interop testing while the drafts are being written.  Something could change, but it is unlikely.  Sometimes people don’t care and they can wait until the RFC is published for the formal numbers.

So in this case, asking for “early assignment” is the thing to do.

From: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@alipay.com>
Date: Monday, August 19, 2019 at 11:56 AM
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Request to code point on new drafts

TBH, I don’t know the difference between an early assignment and a late one (And how will it affect the final publication).

But from the implementation point of view, I think the earlier the better. Since lots of companies/organizations in China are waiting for the IANA code-points then they can implement this in their services and products.

This can definitely bring TLSv1.3 online and can make their business complied to the SCA’s requirements at the same time. Would this make a bit of sense I think...


On Aug 19, 2019, at 11:51 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com<mailto:rsalz@akamai.com>> wrote:

Are you asking for an early code-point assignment, or do you want to wait / can you wait until the document is closer to publication?

On 8/19/19, 9:25 AM, "Paul Yang" <kaishen.yy=40alipay.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:kaishen.yy=40alipay.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:

   Hi there,

   A new draft has submitted by me yesterday: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yang-tls-tls13-sm-suites-00

   It describes how new SM cipher suites are used in TLS1.3. There are several code points we would like to request IANA to assign. An IANA consideration section has been included in this draft. I list the detail as follow as well.
   There are 4 TBD values in this draft:

   CipherSuite TLS_SM4_GCM_SM3 = { TBD1, TBD1 };
   CipherSuite TLS_SM4_CCM_SM3 = { TBD2, TBD2 };

   SignatureScheme sm2sig_sm3 = { TBD3 };

   NamedGroup curveSM2 = { TBD4 };

   Note: typos found in original draft, for TBD4 should be in registry “TLS Supported Groups” instead of “TLS HashAlgorithm”. Will fix this in next version of the draft.

   Please review this request, thanks.

   Regards,

   Paul Yang




Regards,

Paul Yang