[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1141082] Fwd: Early code-point assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id

["Sabrina Tanamal via RT" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Sean, 

Before we proceed with the assignments, can you confirm that these fields are filled out correctly? 

Registry: TLS ExtensionType Values
Value: 53
Extension Name: connection_id
TLS 1.3: - 
Recommended: Y

Registry: TLS ContentType Registry
Value: 25
Description: tls12_cid
DTLS-OK: Y

Thanks,
Sabrina

On Fri Jun 28 03:24:48 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> Amanda,
> 
> I think we’re good to go?
> 
> spt
> 
> > On Jun 26, 2019, at 16:19, Yoav Nir <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry. Sure.
> >
> > These seem fine.
> >
> > Yoav
> >
> >> On 26 Jun 2019, at 19:56, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yoav or Nick,
> >>
> >> If we need two approvals, can one of your confirm these assignments:
> >>
> >> Registry: TLS ExtensionType Values
> >> Value: 53
> >> Extension Name: connection_id
> >>
> >> Registry: TLS ContentType Registry
> >> Value: 25
> >> Extension Name: tls12_cid
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> spt
> >>
> >>> On Jun 24, 2019, at 21:49, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> An excellent question :). When we are done there will be two code
> >>> points assigned for this draft.
> >>>
> >>> spt
> >>>
> >>>> On Jun 24, 2019, at 18:54, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
> >>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Does IANA need to make one or more assignments right now? We
> >>>> understand that we need approvals from at least two designated
> >>>> experts in order to proceed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Sabrina
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun Jun 16 20:46:16 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>>>> So looking at the registry, it seems that
> >>>>> 25  tls1.2 connection id y
> >>>>> Makes sense.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 6/16/19, 1:47 PM, "Sean Turner" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So … it turns out there are two registry requests for this draft:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1) TLS ExtensionType Values: connection_id
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think we got a number assigned here, but we need a couple of
> >>>>> tweaks
> >>>>> in the IANA section (I will submit a PR):
> >>>>>
> >>>>> a) Needs to request new column for DTLS-only
> >>>>> b) Needs to specify TLS1.3 Column value.  I beieive the value
> >>>>> should
> >>>>> be empty as this is only applicable to DTLS 1.2.  To amke this
> >>>>> clear
> >>>>> we should ask for a note.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2) TLS ContentType Registry: tls12_cid
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We still a number assignment for this one.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> spt
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On May 23, 2019, at 13:59, Nick Sullivan <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This sounds good to me. However, there doesn't seem to be a way
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> indicate that this extension is for DTLS only and not TLS. I
> >>>>>> don't
> >>>>>> think that's an issue, but I'm interested to hear if anyone else
> >>>>>> has
> >>>>>> an objection.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:35 AM Salz, Rich <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I don’t recall seeing this until now.  Explicitly copying Yoav
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>> Nick.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I’m one of three and I support this.   Does this work?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Value 53
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> TLS 1.3 –
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Recommended Y
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> RFC TBD
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Joseph Salowey <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>> Date: Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 12:23 PM
> >>>>>> To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "tls-reg-
> >>>>>> [e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>> Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <tls-
> >>>>>> [e-mail]>
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1141082] Fwd: Early code-
> >>>>>> point
> >>>>>> assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I haven't seen the messages appear in the tls-reg-review
> >>>>>> archives so
> >>>>>> I'm cc'ing them on this email to see if its stuck somewhere.
> >>>>>> The
> >>>>>> version of draft that I am preparing to send to the IESG is here
> >>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-
> >>>>>> 05.
> >>>>>> The authors have requested early code point assignment and that
> >>>>>> requires expert approval.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Joe
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:09 AM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
> >>>>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Joe,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We've sent this request to the experts at tls-reg-
> >>>>>> [e-mail] on
> >>>>>> 8 May 2019, and we pinged them again yesterday. We haven't heard
> >>>>>> back
> >>>>>> from the experts regarding this request, could you let us know
> >>>>>> if you
> >>>>>> still don't see it in the archives?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>> Sabrina
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu May 23 05:27:22 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Sabrina,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Am I supposed to ask the experts for a review or will IANA
> >>>>>>> initiate
> >>>>>>> this?
> >>>>>>> I don't think I've seen a request for review appear in the
> >>>>>>> archives
> >>>>>>> for the
> >>>>>>> [e-mail] yet.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Joe
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:54 PM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
> >>>>>>> [e-mail]>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Joe,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We can make the ContentType registration in Section 8 now, but
> >>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> need to
> >>>>>>>> ask you how to fill in the "DTLS-OK" column.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Because the registration procedure for the ExtensionType
> >>>>>>>> Values
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> Specification Required, we need to ask the designated experts
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>> review and
> >>>>>>>> approve the ExtensionType Value registration before we can
> >>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>> an
> >>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>> allocation.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sabrina Tanamal
> >>>>>>>> Senior IANA Services Specialist
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed May 08 14:25:55 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Michelle,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yes, this is a request for both.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Joe
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 6:51 AM Michelle Cotton via RT <
> >>>>>>>> [e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hello Joe,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Apologies for the delay in my response.  I hope you are
> >>>>>>>>>> doing
> >>>>>>>>>> well.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Quick question for your request below.  In the document
> >>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>>>> requests for parameter registrations.  Are you requesting
> >>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>> allocation
> >>>>>>>>>> for both?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --Michelle
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue Apr 23 04:51:06 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi IANA,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We have received a request for  early code point assignment
> >>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-04.  The chairs believe
> >>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> draft
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>> stable.  Our AD, Ben also approves this early assignment.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please
> >>>>>>>> let me
> >>>>>>>>>>> know if you need more information or have any questions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Joe
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >>>>>>>>>>> From: Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 7:12 PM
> >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Early code-point assignment request for
> >>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id
> >>>>>>>>>>> To: Joseph Salowey <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Cc: tls-chairs <[e-mail]>, <tls-reg-
> >>>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:32:00PM -0700, Joseph Salowey
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ben,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We have a request for early code point assignment
> >>>>>>>>>>>> for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id.  We believe the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> draft
> >>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> stable
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> no one has objected to the early code point announcement
> >>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> list.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if you have any questions or need more
> >>>>>>>>>>>> information.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to see this go forward.
> >>>>>>>>>>> (You will send the actual request to IANA, not me, right?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, and sorry for the slow response,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ben
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >