Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Ext] Re: [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3

["Paul Yang" <[e-mail]>]

Sure, no problem ;-)



Regards,

Paul Yang------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender:Salz, Rich<[e-mail]>
Date:2019/09/19 09:31:31
Recipient:Paul Yang<[e-mail]>; Michelle Cotton<[e-mail]>; Yoav Nir<[e-mail]>; Nick Sullivan<[e-mail]>
Cc:[e-mail]<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<[e-mail]>
Theme:Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Ext] Re: [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3

      
TBD4 of course.  Typo, sigh :(
 
From: Rich Salz <[e-mail]>
Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:18 PM
To: Paul Yang <[e-mail]>, Michelle Cotton <[e-mail]>, Yoav Nir <[e-mail]>, Nick Sullivan <[e-mail]>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Ext] Re: [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3 
  
Yes, you are completely correct.  TBD41 is 41 and, right, the Recommended column (with value N) stays.


From: Paul Yang <[e-mail]>
Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:13 PM
To: Rich Salz <[e-mail]>, Michelle Cotton <[e-mail]>, Yoav Nir <[e-mail]>, Nick Sullivan <[e-mail]>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, Paul Yang <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Ext] Re: [Tls-reg-review] [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3 
 
Thanks Rich for the suggestions, will update the draft. Actually there is a typo in the draft, the TBD4 should be in SupportedGroup registry instead of HashAgorithm. So I guess the nunber of TBD4 might be 41 and the Recommended still remians?





Regards,

 Paul Yang  
------------------------------------------------------------------
 Sender:Salz, Rich<[e-mail]>
 Date:2019/09/19 02:53:49
 Recipient:Michelle Cotton<[e-mail]>; Yoav Nir<[e-mail]>; Nick Sullivan<[e-mail]>
 Cc:[e-mail]<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<[e-mail]>; Paul Yang<[e-mail]>
 Theme:Re: [Ext] Re: [Tls-reg-review] [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3




Looking at  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yang-tls-tls13-sm-suites-00, the IANA considerations in particular, I suggest the following:

             +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
             | Value | Description     | DTLS-OK | Reference |
             +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
             |  TBD1 | TLS_SM4_GCM_SM3 | No      | this RFC  |
             |       |                 |         |           |
             |  TBD2 | TLS_SM4_CCM_SM3 | No      | this RFC  |
             +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
Update the TLS Cipher Suites table to include
TBD1 is 0x00,0xC6
TBD2 is 0x00,0xC7
Note to the draft authors: This table is missing the “Recommended” column.  It should be filled in with “N”


               +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
               | Value | Description | DTLS-OK | Reference |
               +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
               |  TBD3 | sm2sig_sm3  | No      | this RFC  |
               +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
TBD3 is 0x0708
Note to the draft authors: This table is missing the “Recommended” column. It should be filled in with “N”
 
 
        +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
        | Value | Description | DTLS-OK | Recommended | Reference |
        +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
        |  TBD4 | curveSM2    | No      | No          | this RFC  |
        +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
TBD4 is 224
Note to the draft authors: This table should NOT have the “Recommended” column.