[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1147787] Request to register value in TLS extension registry for Delegated Credentials (draft-ietf-tls-subcerts)

"Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org> Wed, 04 September 2019 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D98912009E for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.629
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPs2W4wzNE3F for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 062F112004C for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09E8E0AF7; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 00:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CE8EA2055F; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 00:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <CAFDDyk94r3BV2=KiqzpRTQvoNN8S_vjXCfY-qxy0-r8A4RxnCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1147787@icann.org> <CAFDDyk94r3BV2=KiqzpRTQvoNN8S_vjXCfY-qxy0-r8A4RxnCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-9078-1567555554-1375.1147787-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1147787
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: tls-reg-review@ietf.org, nick@cloudflare.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:05:54 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/Q0SNdhKZx292-IIl0mq89embxxg>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1147787] Request to register value in TLS extension registry for Delegated Credentials (draft-ietf-tls-subcerts)
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:05:56 -0000

Hi Nick,

Resending this question: can you confirm that we should make this assignment now, rather than before the document is approved?

If so, should we use value(s) 33-34, 36-40, 54, or 57-65279?

thanks,
Amanda

On Fri Aug 02 19:50:20 2019, rsalz@akamai.com wrote:
> I am fine with whatever number Nick wants :)
> 
> On 8/2/19, 2:19 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-param@iana.org>
> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> If you'd like us to make the assignment now, should we take the value
> from range 32-34, 36-40, or 54-65279?
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> On Wed Jul 24 13:37:01 2019, amanda.baber wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Should we make this registration now or wait for the document to be
> > approved?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Amanda
> >
> > On Tue Jul 23 22:03:58 2019, nick@cloudflare.com wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'd like to request a review from the other two members of the
> > > review
> > > panel
> > > for a new extension value for a draft that is currently adopted by
> > > the TLS
> > > working group: Delegated Credentials for TLS.
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-subcerts/
> > >
> > > CH, CR, CT, Recommended: Y
> > >
> > > Nick
> 
> 
>