IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tls-reg-review] Request to Register Value in TLS ALPN Registry

Roland Shoemaker <roland@letsencrypt.org> Tue, 01 October 2019 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <roland@letsencrypt.org>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236F212021C for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=letsencrypt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jk6NvdYWDpPE for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76A51120831 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id o44so12414529ota.10 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=letsencrypt.org; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qbEJMaqJ/CeULCgnx08pNtWhSJGnUpZaXi+Ht4PbMxg=; b=QlAMJp97N9+VxH3McthyirLIc3hVi63h2925XcOa7xPXVZMyDWRXBHACb2oX0KDTZb LNoFFlKcKjtkjozhr6Yer35xQ7I9ezTetSLL5jG9c/We06zqO4lMlBe0AqOSKPkt+ANk IOn5fbQy3DVAy+Qpv8+EifD/AcHc0Mlz94eTQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qbEJMaqJ/CeULCgnx08pNtWhSJGnUpZaXi+Ht4PbMxg=; b=qpkWJ7WnopTKUyxU+d9Jp6Lmm3Ki6VgXirNZ9DsXCXVniol6yXrGPjNLkrkA0XyhBd 0J9CN4HPmPjRGLNMQ29v6ZR3G67+KctUSX1scIr/HElxR+6gS0lldt4nkbxADtm9r/qe mQCHgTC3FVrGN+YdOr2D587f8s2vSDsgtjQTXbQN4epTyrcajRH0wavcPaIHDCe6HSwk vnteWwgp+lMF9stSPS5LjP1qYPqYn/+hrmhyGZIWMSYLgOHybG6OPFP1KRD8VdSQKzPi faFsF6gl5WR+wAESALqu+fX0Be0LedB6f6jH18sFl3VBt+wYdYwS634e0aGMqFfieaNH D6xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV9vglB6fjaj0sHXC+456ZiIgcmM9RhbvaelzOSON+M+PgK5x1Z yTfYkmdC5ykN00n5+uRMerRI6Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx/Toav893NoO2cRP9TgGVZuija56I9aG7KPDZxU596C1Aor2zWBlNENM4t4zasnXHuwqxstg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:17c7:: with SMTP id p7mr18365388ota.314.1569954089706; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:bd50:a5b0:98b6:333c:5dd8:82ec? ([2600:1700:bd50:a5b0:98b6:333c:5dd8:82ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z5sm4840981oto.77.2019.10.01.11.21.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Roland Shoemaker <roland@letsencrypt.org>
In-Reply-To: <328E9157-3783-40E5-BFFC-C12041DF591E@akamai.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 11:21:27 -0700
Cc: "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <69C97EE3-989F-4CE2-87A0-58F8AEEB320F@letsencrypt.org>
References: <44F8FA5B-CEB3-4E14-B162-60CC3A6728E1@letsencrypt.org> <328E9157-3783-40E5-BFFC-C12041DF591E@akamai.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/SWvsy60RLaVWiyiCJhH-Dy5G5TU>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Request to Register Value in TLS ALPN Registry
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 18:22:03 -0000

Heh, it’s not necessarily required and you are correct it is rather redundant. That said the protocol ID is already in use so making changes to the sequence now will be somewhat painful. That said if you are dead set against it, we can likely handle the change.

> On Oct 1, 2019, at 11:18 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> Is the "-tls" suffix needed?  I prefer it were removed (nobody else has it, and the TLS is implied :)
> 
> On 10/1/19, 1:47 PM, "Roland Shoemaker" <roland@letsencrypt.org> wrote:
> 
>    Hello,
> 
>    I’m writing to request registration of a TLS ALPN Protocol ID. This ID is to be used as part of a new ACME validation method and is specified in draft-acme-tls-alpn Section 6.2 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn/). This document is currently in IESG Evaluation so we expect it to actually be published.
> 
>    Let me know if you have any questions and I’ll be happy to help.
>    Roland
>    _______________________________________________
>    tls-reg-review mailing list
>    tls-reg-review@ietf.org
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email