Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Ext] Re: [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3

[Paul Yang <[e-mail]>]

Hi there,

I have uploaded a new version of the draft which includes the code points suggested by Rich in previous email:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yang-tls-tls13-sm-suites-01 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yang-tls-tls13-sm-suites-01>

Along with other updates (official English references to Chinese algorithms, typos…)

> On Sep 19, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Paul Yang <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Sure, no problem ;-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul Yang
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sender:Salz, Rich<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Date:2019/09/19 09:31:31
> Recipient:Paul Yang<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; Michelle Cotton<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; Yoav Nir<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; Nick Sullivan<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Cc:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]><[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]><[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> Theme:Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Ext] Re: [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3
> 
> TBD4 of course.  Typo, sigh :(
> 
> From: Rich Salz <[e-mail]>
> Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:18 PM
> To: Paul Yang <[e-mail]>, Michelle Cotton <[e-mail]>, Yoav Nir <[e-mail]>, Nick Sullivan <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Ext] Re: [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3
> 
> Yes, you are completely correct.  TBD41 is 41 and, right, the Recommended column (with value N) stays.
> 
> 
> From: Paul Yang <[e-mail]>
> Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:13 PM
> To: Rich Salz <[e-mail]>, Michelle Cotton <[e-mail]>, Yoav Nir <[e-mail]>, Nick Sullivan <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, Paul Yang <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Ext] Re: [Tls-reg-review] [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3
> 
> Thanks Rich for the suggestions, will update the draft. Actually there is a typo in the draft, the TBD4 should be in SupportedGroup registry instead of HashAgorithm. So I guess the nunber of TBD4 might be 41 and the Recommended still remians?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul Yang
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sender:Salz, Rich<[e-mail]>
> Date:2019/09/19 02:53:49
> Recipient:Michelle Cotton<[e-mail]>; Yoav Nir<[e-mail]>; Nick Sullivan<[e-mail]>
> Cc:[e-mail]<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<[e-mail]>; Paul Yang<[e-mail]>
> Theme:Re: [Ext] Re: [Tls-reg-review] [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3
> 
> 
> 
> Looking at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yang-tls-tls13-sm-suites-00 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dyang-2Dtls-2Dtls13-2Dsm-2Dsuites-2D00&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=BOyJ17MYeXYNjETacf5xP3XcyBXx5ireIgTePS9A40g&s=0PAZs7PUEAldTXT2gjbpM-86LEmZjSBpbHIeb-lGAKA&e=>, the IANA considerations in particular, I suggest the following:
> 
>              +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
>              | Value | Description     | DTLS-OK | Reference |
>              +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
>              |  TBD1 | TLS_SM4_GCM_SM3 | No      | this RFC  |
>              |       |                 |         |           |
>              |  TBD2 | TLS_SM4_CCM_SM3 | No      | this RFC  |
>              +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
> Update the TLS Cipher Suites table to include
> TBD1 is 0x00,0xC6
> TBD2 is 0x00,0xC7
> Note to the draft authors: This table is missing the “Recommended” column.  It should be filled in with “N”
> 
> 
>                +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
>                | Value | Description | DTLS-OK | Reference |
>                +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
>                |  TBD3 | sm2sig_sm3  | No      | this RFC  |
>                +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
> TBD3 is 0x0708
> Note to the draft authors: This table is missing the “Recommended” column. It should be filled in with “N”
> 
> 
>         +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
>         | Value | Description | DTLS-OK | Recommended | Reference |
>         +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
>         |  TBD4 | curveSM2    | No      | No          | this RFC  |
>         +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
> TBD4 is 224
> Note to the draft authors: This table should NOT have the “Recommended” column.


Regards,

Paul Yang