Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Ext] Re: [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3

"Paul Yang" <kaishen.yy@antfin.com> Thu, 19 September 2019 01:13 UTC

Return-Path: <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44B51200EC; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b21ucxap6r7S; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out0-149.mail.aliyun.com (out0-149.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D35A1200B2; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R891e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01a16378; MF=kaishen.yy@antfin.com; NM=1; PH=DW; RN=7; SR=0; TI=dingding_android.COREAPI41f7a855f6d3491b8ec29884bc935e86;
Received: from WS-web (kaishen.yy@antfin.com[dingding_android.COREAPI41f7a855f6d3491b8ec29884bc935e86]) by e01l04363.eu6 at Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:13:11 +0800
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:13:11 +0800
From: "Paul Yang" <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
To: "=?UTF-8?B?U2FseiwgUmljaA==?=" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "Michelle Cotton" <michelle.cotton@iana.org>, "Yoav Nir" <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, "Nick Sullivan" <nick@cloudflare.com>
Cc: "sec-ads@ietf.org" <sec-ads@ietf.org>, "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>, "Paul Yang" <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Message-ID: <410171c0-5e2b-487b-bb72-46b41d6e652f.kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: [Alimail-Mailagent]
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <957FB79E-F8DC-46D8-B944-E4F6E7F0EC0C@akamai.com>
References: <20a27f61-98cf-4b2c-b6a8-e25aabd56099.kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com> <83CBB97A-A3D3-48AC-9B1B-35557EE4CC95@antfin.com> <C13CBEB9-36AA-49BC-9F20-1BB0DD0E414E@ll.mit.edu> <6C74B593-C6D7-4D2E-97D8-90935E01A65E@antfin.com> <768D5E2F-4DD5-475A-A719-0BB7323204AF@akamai.com> <E5C48351-5C65-48D1-BBED-82855A7B58EB@gmail.com> <20190914010128.GL10656@kduck.mit.edu> <D1D5C368-E279-4A37-A097-F1FAF2CC69AA@akamai.com> <4FE285B0-A7EA-4D73-B0DA-119B5174227A@antfin.com> <E727D4E7-6AAF-4453-A952-43F2E23E958A@antfin.com> <678DC766-6E67-40E5-AB29-D2BFD80CD282@iana.org> <723A8473-FF11-4D2E-81DC-14B90323D992@gmail.com> <1CB40491-FE94-4FC6-8815-D14DE5E87235@iana.org>, <957FB79E-F8DC-46D8-B944-E4F6E7F0EC0C@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=ALIBOUNDARY_18741_5095d940_5d82d627_1e2bb4c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/gkEr3p2a5Lt3q5XtMIDp9qoDzH0>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] =?utf-8?b?W0V4dF0gUmU6ICBbVExTXSAob2ZmbGluZSkg?= =?utf-8?q?Re=3A_Draft_for_SM_cipher_suites_used_in_TLS1=2E3?=
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:13:36 -0000

Thanks Rich for the suggestions, will update the draft. Actually there is a typo in the draft, the TBD4 should be in SupportedGroup registry instead of HashAgorithm. So I guess the nunber of TBD4 might be 41 and the Recommended still remians?



Regards,

Paul Yang------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender:Salz, Rich<rsalz@akamai.com>
Date:2019/09/19 02:53:49
Recipient:Michelle Cotton<michelle.cotton@iana.org>rg>; Yoav Nir<ynir.ietf@gmail.com>om>; Nick Sullivan<nick@cloudflare.com>
Cc:sec-ads@ietf.org<sec-ads@ietf.org>; tls-reg-review@ietf.org<tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Paul Yang<kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Theme:Re: [Ext] Re: [Tls-reg-review] [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3

      
Looking at  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yang-tls-tls13-sm-suites-00, the IANA considerations in particular, I suggest the following:
 
             +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
             | Value | Description     | DTLS-OK | Reference |
             +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
             |  TBD1 | TLS_SM4_GCM_SM3 | No      | this RFC  |
             |       |                 |         |           |
             |  TBD2 | TLS_SM4_CCM_SM3 | No      | this RFC  |
             +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
Update the TLS Cipher Suites table to include
TBD1 is 0x00,0xC6
TBD2 is 0x00,0xC7
Note to the draft authors: This table is missing the “Recommended” column.  It should be filled in with “N”
 
 
               +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
               | Value | Description | DTLS-OK | Reference |
               +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
               |  TBD3 | sm2sig_sm3  | No      | this RFC  |
               +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
TBD3 is 0x0708
Note to the draft authors: This table is missing the “Recommended” column. It should be filled in with “N”
 
 
        +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
        | Value | Description | DTLS-OK | Recommended | Reference |
        +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
        |  TBD4 | curveSM2    | No      | No          | this RFC  |
        +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
TBD4 is 224
Note to the draft authors: This table should NOT have the “Recommended” column.