IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for SIP

"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Sat, 01 May 2021 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283663A1C48 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2021 09:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6s7FaWMy4Iw6 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2021 09:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp7.webway.se (smtp7.webway.se [IPv6:2a02:920:212e::205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12E433A1F8E for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 May 2021 09:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from olles-mbp.webway.org (h-205-16.A165.corp.bahnhof.se [176.10.205.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp7.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EABFBBDE; Sat, 1 May 2021 18:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
Message-Id: <7E62601F-33FC-4B27-912B-3DCB0CB2A231@edvina.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4DFA8F1D-EF4C-4166-9A9B-84DE972509B0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 18:01:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: <9DF82E49-689F-4093-AC2F-DD2CD6C96443@gmail.com>
Cc: Olle E Johansson <oej@edvina.net>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <14F42417-364C-47CE-8943-6BEFD902906F@edvina.net> <289CC988-26CA-4FA5-A311-70EA04713678@akamai.com> <9DF82E49-689F-4093-AC2F-DD2CD6C96443@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/ik88vKPAEd1L4QC_chwzNkgFr4Y>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] IANA TLS ALPN registry for SIP
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 16:02:02 -0000


> On 1 May 2021, at 17:15, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Is RFC 3261 a valid reference?  It’s valid for SIP, but doesn’t describe using ALPN.  In fact, what it says about TLS is that by default, proxies should be listening on port 5061 for TLS, not sharing some common port with other services.
> 
> Is there some document that talks about sharing a port between SIP and other services?
There is a document covering STUN on the same port, but it doesn’t really answer your question.

What I was thinking about is a few implementations
that server HTTPS and SIP/TLS on the same socket in order to support both SIP over websockets
and SIP/TLS. One that I’m involved with is Kamailio at kamailio.org <http://kamailio.org/> which would be helped by ALPN
usage.

I did not see a requirement for an RFC that covers ALPN usage in the referenced protocol
in the requirement texts for IANA ALPN registration, but if that’s the case I guess we have to produce something.

/O
> 
> Yoav
> 
>> On 30 Apr 2021, at 18:21, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> This looks good to me.  Will need Yoav or Nick to also approve.
>> 
>> On 4/30/21, 3:12 AM, "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> wrote:
>> 
>>   I would like to register a TLS ALPN registry entry for the Session Initiation Protocol according to the following entry:
>> 
>>      Protocol:  SIP
>>      Identification Sequence:
>>         0x73 0x69 0x70  (“sip")
>>      Reference:  [RFC3261]
>> 
>>   Best regards,
>>   /Olle E. Johansson
>>   _______________________________________________
>>   tls-reg-review mailing list
>>   tls-reg-review@ietf.org
>>   https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review__;!!GjvTz_vk!BzhIvT8_gOqJ8H95ghJps9NOZ-nnsQ6GnSGICKr3XFzpOHVoa0Zkn-6s6p0K$ 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tls-reg-review mailing list
>> tls-reg-review@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email