IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1180467] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator (tls-extensiontype-values, tls-parameters, )

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 31 March 2021 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0083A3BFC for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.217
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.217 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JECDFZz58vny for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A7F3A3BFB for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 12VNshV5008058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 19:54:48 -0400
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:54:43 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Cc: rsalz@akamai.com, tls-reg-review@ietf.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com
Message-ID: <20210331235443.GP79563@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <RT-Ticket-1180467@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22664-1602780894-1622.1180467-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-17319-1602782099-1034.1180467-37-0@icann.org> <CF9B1567-7769-4A3F-AD05-F696544EA0FF@akamai.com> <988ECEF9-325A-4441-9B72-3D027E8F0CC7@gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-7110-1602828066-1613.1180467-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-2084-1617231366-1858.1180467-9-0@icann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-2084-1617231366-1858.1180467-9-0@icann.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/k6NlMTAYujkVgRvTxs2hkAxQznQ>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1180467] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator (tls-extensiontype-values, tls-parameters, )
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 23:55:19 -0000

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:56:06PM +0000, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> Hi Rich, Yoav,
> 
> Can you confirm that you approve of the current version of this document?
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-14
> 
> The most recent version indicates that 1) this document will be the sole reference for server_name (0) in the TLS ExtensionType Values registry, and 2) the "DTLS-OK" and "Recommended" values for the new TLS Exporter Labels will be set to "Y."

This document should be added as a reference for server_name(0); it is not
the only reference.  (I'm actually not entirely sure why it should be a
reference for "server_name" at all, but I will have a better sense of that
after I do my review for IESG Evaluation.)

-Ben

> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> On Fri Oct 16 06:01:06 2020, ynir.ietf@gmail.com wrote:
> > Yes, I agree
> > 
> > > On 15 Oct 2020, at 21:05, Salz, Rich
> > > <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks good to me.
> > >
> > > On 10/15/20, 1:15 PM, "Sabrina Tanamal via RT" <drafts-expert-
> > > review@iana.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rich, Yoav, Nick,
> > >
> > > Can you review the TLS Extension Type and TLS Exporter Labels
> > > registrations in this document for us?
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > > 3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dietf-2Dtls-2Dexported-
> > > 2Dauthenticator&d=DwICAg&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-
> > > w&m=k5OsK_oHSocR3RBNfzBN80fKVS6F1HBy5cBwOzxWKOE&s=N0daDmOr146Bmn9tXe50LzkmNeGgYE8gi0gFs143eKA&e=
> > >
> > > We'll wait for at least two of you to approve before we mark this
> > > document "IANA OK" in the Datatracker.
> > >
> > > The deadline for reviews would be November 5th, according to RFC
> > > 8447.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Sabrina Tanamal
> > > Senior IANA Services Specialist
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > tls-reg-review mailing list
> > > tls-reg-review@ietf.org
> > >  https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_tls-2Dreg-
> > > 2Dreview&d=DwICAg&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-
> > > w&m=k5OsK_oHSocR3RBNfzBN80fKVS6F1HBy5cBwOzxWKOE&s=lSA_ZG6TbvHvDZyjX2d-
> > > bOUlz1wIkY9sieXMfN2nbQI&e=
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > tls-reg-review mailing list
> > > tls-reg-review@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tls-reg-review mailing list
> tls-reg-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email