Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1141082] Early code-point assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id

["Salz, Rich" <[e-mail]>]

That would work (for now) and seems the fastest path forward.

So we approve the assignment and a rev'd draft will contain the annotation Sean mentions.

On 6/13/19, 11:16 AM, "Sean Turner" <[e-mail]> wrote:

    I think we could do this by updating the IANA considerations section in draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id.
    
    spt
    
    > On Jun 11, 2019, at 12:17, Salz, Rich <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > 
    > How long would it take to add a comment field or a {dtls/tls/both} column?
    > 
    > On 6/11/19, 12:15 PM, "Sabrina Tanamal via RT" <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > 
    >    Hi all, 
    > 
    >    Can you let us know if we can proceed with this request or is there discussion needed based on the questions asked by Chris and Nick? 
    > 
    >    NOTE: We're trying to figure out if there's an issue with the mailing list, so we're explicitly copying Rich, Yoav and Nick. 
    > 
    >    Thanks,
    > 
    >    Sabrina Tanamal
    >    Senior IANA Services Specialist
    > 
    >    On Mon May 27 18:59:48 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
    >> I’ve no strong objections, though erring on the side of clarity is
    >> probably best. How difficult would it be to add a field to distinguish
    >> between the two?
    >> 
    >> Best,
    >> Chris
    >> 
    >> On Thu, May 23, 2019, at 11:00 AM, Nick Sullivan wrote:
    >>> This sounds good to me. However, there doesn't seem to be a way to
    >>> indicate that this extension is for DTLS only and not TLS. I don't
    >>> think that's an issue, but I'm interested to hear if anyone else has
    >>> an objection.
    >>> 
    >>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:35 AM Salz, Rich <[e-mail]> wrote:
    >>>> __ __
    >>> 
    >>>> I don’t recall seeing this until now. Explicitly copying Yoav and
    >>>> Nick.____
    >>> 
    >>>> __ __
    >>> 
    >>>> I’m one of three and I support this. Does this work?____
    >>> 
    >>>> Value 53____
    >>> 
    >>>> TLS 1.3 –____
    >>> 
    >>>> Recommended Y____
    >>> 
    >>>> RFC TBD____
    >>> 
    >>>> __ __
    >>> 
    >>>> *From: *Joseph Salowey <[e-mail]>
    >>>> *Date: *Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 12:23 PM
    >>>> *To: *"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "tls-reg-
    >>>> [e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
    >>>> *Cc: *Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <tls-
    >>>> [e-mail]>
    >>>> *Subject: *Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1141082] Fwd: Early code-
    >>>> point assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id____
    >>> 
    >>>> __ __
    >>> 
    >>>> I haven't seen the messages appear in the tls-reg-review archives
    >>>> so I'm cc'ing them on this email to see if its stuck somewhere. The
    >>>> version of draft that I am preparing to send to the IESG is here
    >>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-05
    >>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
    >>>> 3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dietf-2Dtls-2Ddtls-2Dconnection-
    >>>> 2Did-2D05&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-
    >>>> w&m=AFFRssmLkZuplUd1HVENEAI4HsfgSfv353Ivwszsxwc&s=6AXFN925MRdSclV8uo2RFkWtrlWPoTZdLcXbR6fzS8g&e=>.
    >>>> The authors have requested early code point assignment and that
    >>>> requires expert approval. ____
    >>> 
    >>>> __ __
    >>> 
    >>>> Thanks,____
    >>> 
    >>>> __ __
    >>> 
    >>>> Joe____
    >>> 
    >>>> __ __
    >>> 
    >>>> __ __
    >>> 
    >>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:09 AM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
    >>>> [e-mail]> wrote:____
    >>> 
    >>>>> Hi Joe,
    >>>>> 
    >>>>> We've sent this request to the experts at [e-mail]
    >>>>> on 8 May 2019, and we pinged them again yesterday. We haven't
    >>>>> heard back from the experts regarding this request, could you let
    >>>>> us know if you still don't see it in the archives?
    >>>>> 
    >>>>> Thank you,
    >>>>> Sabrina
    >>>>> 
    >>>>> On Thu May 23 05:27:22 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
    >>>>>> Hi Sabrina,
    >>>>>> 
    >>>>>> Am I supposed to ask the experts for a review or will IANA
    >>>>>> initiate
    >>>>>> this?
    >>>>>> I don't think I've seen a request for review appear in the
    >>>>>> archives
    >>>>>> for the
    >>>>>> [e-mail] yet.
    >>>>>> 
    >>>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>>> 
    >>>>>> Joe
    >>>>>> 
    >>>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:54 PM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
    >>>>>> [e-mail]>
    >>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>> 
    >>>>>>> Hi Joe,
    >>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>> We can make the ContentType registration in Section 8 now, but
    >>>>>>> we
    >>>>>>> need to
    >>>>>>> ask you how to fill in the "DTLS-OK" column.
    >>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>> Because the registration procedure for the ExtensionType
    >>>>>>> Values is
    >>>>>>> Specification Required, we need to ask the designated experts
    >>>>>>> to
    >>>>>>> review and
    >>>>>>> approve the ExtensionType Value registration before we can
    >>>>>>> make an
    >>>>>>> early
    >>>>>>> allocation.
    >>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>> Sabrina Tanamal
    >>>>>>> Senior IANA Services Specialist
    >>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>> On Wed May 08 14:25:55 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
    >>>>>>>> Hi Michelle,
    >>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>> Yes, this is a request for both.
    >>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>> Joe
    >>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 6:51 AM Michelle Cotton via RT <
    >>>>>>> [e-mail]>
    >>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>> Hello Joe,
    >>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>> Apologies for the delay in my response. I hope you are
    >>>>>>>>> doing
    >>>>>>>>> well.
    >>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>> Quick question for your request below. In the document
    >>>>>>>>> there are
    >>>>>>>>> 2
    >>>>>>>>> requests for parameter registrations. Are you requesting
    >>>>>>>>> early
    >>>>>>> allocation
    >>>>>>>>> for both?
    >>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
    >>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>> --Michelle
    >>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>> On Tue Apr 23 04:51:06 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>> Hi IANA,
    >>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>> We have received a request for early code point
    >>>>>>>>>> assignment for
    >>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-04. The chairs believe
    >>>>>>>>>> that
    >>>>>>>>>> the
    >>>>>>> draft
    >>>>>>>>> is
    >>>>>>>>>> stable. Our AD, Ben also approves this early assignment.
    >>>>>>>>>> Please
    >>>>>>> let me
    >>>>>>>>>> know if you need more information or have any questions.
    >>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>> Joe
    >>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
    >>>>>>>>>> From: Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>
    >>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 7:12 PM
    >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Early code-point assignment request for
    >>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id
    >>>>>>>>>> To: Joseph Salowey <[e-mail]>
    >>>>>>>>>> Cc: tls-chairs <[e-mail]>, <tls-reg-
    >>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]>
    >>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:32:00PM -0700, Joseph Salowey
    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ben,
    >>>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>>> We have a request for early code point assignment
    >>>>>>>>>>> for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id. We believe the
    >>>>>>>>>>> draft
    >>>>>>>>>>> is
    >>>>>>> stable
    >>>>>>>>> and
    >>>>>>>>>>> no one has objected to the early code point
    >>>>>>>>>>> announcement on
    >>>>>>>>>>> the
    >>>>>>> list.
    >>>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if you have any questions or need more
    >>>>>>>>>>> information.
    >>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to see this go forward.
    >>>>>>>>>> (You will send the actual request to IANA, not me,
    >>>>>>>>>> right?)
    >>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, and sorry for the slow response,
    >>>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>>> Ben
    >>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>> 
    >>>>>>> ____
    >>> 
    > 
    >