Re: [Tls-reg-review] Application for the TLS code points

Wang Haiguang <wang.haiguang.shieldlab@huawei.com> Thu, 28 March 2019 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <wang.haiguang.shieldlab@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13372120074 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NEyPr2TUaFQM for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2053E12048B for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 68428743D830F0C7F0C1 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:34:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SINEML703-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.223.161.53) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:34:20 +0000
Received: from SINEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.80]) by SINEML703-CAH.china.huawei.com ([10.223.161.53]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:34:17 +0800
From: Wang Haiguang <wang.haiguang.shieldlab@huawei.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Thread-Topic: [Tls-reg-review] Application for the TLS code points
Thread-Index: AdTjsRNQhTnhtpztT82MCwhezgKp5wBL3WEAABgGZqo=
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:34:17 +0000
Message-ID: <0AE05CBFB1A6A0468C8581DAE58A31309E35C40C@SINEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <0AE05CBFB1A6A0468C8581DAE58A31309E345DA7@SINEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com>, <11052966-A4BF-4BD2-A51B-29CF89BBE965@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <11052966-A4BF-4BD2-A51B-29CF89BBE965@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-SG, en-US
Content-Language: en-SG
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.220.69.241]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0AE05CBFB1A6A0468C8581DAE58A31309E35C40CSINEML521MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/pvNgKLmfKHkEq_cl4Fl9KeVyD1E>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Application for the TLS code points
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:34:29 -0000

Dear Yoav,

Thanks very much for the comments.

We will update the draft according to your suggestion and will upload the IETF data tracker soon.

Previously we have submit a version 9, but it seems that version is not the data tracker, so I am going to change the version number to 9 for next submission instead of a 10.

Best regards.

Haiguang
________________________________
From: Yoav Nir [ynir.ietf@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 28 March, 2019 1:03:32 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: tls-reg-review@ietf.org; Sean Turner
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Application for the TLS code points

Hi, Haiguang

We’ve discussed it, and you can get your code points.  However, there are a few things you need to do first:

  1.  The current draft in the datatracker is version -08, not -10. That version requests just one code point assignment, not 4.  Please submit the updated draft.
  2.  Even in the PDF version of the draft, the four code points appear in section 4, but they do not appear in section 8 (IANA Considerations).
  3.  The IANA considerations section is confusing.  It states that IANA is asked to assign an OID, and in the next bullet point says that this OID has already been assigned.  It’s not clear to me, and it won’t be clear to IANA what you want them to do.

So please get back to us after you submit a revised draft with a fixed section 8, and we will instruct IANA to make the assignment.

Hope this helps.

Yoav
(on behalf of the TLS review team)

On 26 Mar 2019, at 9:58, Wang Haiguang <wang.haiguang.shieldlab@huawei.com<mailto:wang.haiguang.shieldlab@huawei.com>> wrote:

Dear Rich, Yoav and Nick

This is Haiguang Wang from Huawei.

Currently we are working on a personal draft named as draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10.
We have made a presentation in IETF 104 yesterday. Attached is the our presentation slides and the draft that will be upload to the IETF meeting.

We need 4 code points for four IBS signature algorithms, so please review and let us know whether we can get the four code points for implementation and testing of the protocol.

enum {
...
/* IBS ECCSI signature algorithm */
eccsi_sha256 (TBD),
iso_ibs1 (TBD),
iso_ibs2 (TBD),
iso_chinese_ibs (TBD),
/* Reserved Code Points */
private_use (0xFE00..0xFFFF),
(0xFFFF)
} SignatureScheme;


Best regards.

Haiguang
<draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10.pdf><slides-104-TLS-raw-public-key-IBC-10.pdf>_______________________________________________
tls-reg-review mailing list
tls-reg-review@ietf.org<mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review