[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1141082] Fwd: Early code-point assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id (tls-parameters, tls-extensiontype-values)

["Sabrina Tanamal via RT" <[e-mail]>]

Hi all, 

The early allocations for this document are complete. 

We've made the following early allocation at https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values: 

53	connection_id (TEMPORARY - registered 2019-07-02, expires 2020-07-02)	-	Y	[draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id]

We've made the following early allocation at https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters:

25	tls12_cid (TEMPORARY - registered 2019-07-02, expires 2020-07-02)	Y	[draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id]

If this document hasn't been approved for publication by July 2020, we'll contact you about approving a one-year renewal. Any further renewals would require IESG approval.

Best regards,

Sabrina Tanamal
Senior IANA Services Specialist

On Tue Jul 02 22:08:04 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> These look correct to me.  Post away!
> 
> spt
> 
> > On Jun 28, 2019, at 12:17, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
> > [e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> > Before we proceed with the assignments, can you confirm that these
> > fields are filled out correctly?
> >
> > Registry: TLS ExtensionType Values
> > Value: 53
> > Extension Name: connection_id
> >  TLS 1.3: -
> > Recommended: Y
> >
> > Registry: TLS ContentType Registry
> > Value: 25
> > Description: tls12_cid
> > DTLS-OK: Y
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sabrina
> >
> > On Fri Jun 28 03:24:48 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> >> Amanda,
> >>
> >> I think we’re good to go?
> >>
> >> spt
> >>
> >>> On Jun 26, 2019, at 16:19, Yoav Nir <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sorry. Sure.
> >>>
> >>> These seem fine.
> >>>
> >>> Yoav
> >>>
> >>>> On 26 Jun 2019, at 19:56, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Yoav or Nick,
> >>>>
> >>>> If we need two approvals, can one of your confirm these
> >>>> assignments:
> >>>>
> >>>> Registry: TLS ExtensionType Values
> >>>> Value: 53
> >>>> Extension Name: connection_id
> >>>>
> >>>> Registry: TLS ContentType Registry
> >>>> Value: 25
> >>>> Extension Name: tls12_cid
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> spt
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jun 24, 2019, at 21:49, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> An excellent question :). When we are done there will be two code
> >>>>> points assigned for this draft.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> spt
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jun 24, 2019, at 18:54, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
> >>>>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Does IANA need to make one or more assignments right now? We
> >>>>>> understand that we need approvals from at least two designated
> >>>>>> experts in order to proceed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Sabrina
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun Jun 16 20:46:16 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>>>>>> So looking at the registry, it seems that
> >>>>>>> 25  tls1.2 connection id y
> >>>>>>> Makes sense.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 6/16/19, 1:47 PM, "Sean Turner" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So … it turns out there are two registry requests for this
> >>>>>>> draft:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1) TLS ExtensionType Values: connection_id
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think we got a number assigned here, but we need a couple of
> >>>>>>> tweaks
> >>>>>>> in the IANA section (I will submit a PR):
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> a) Needs to request new column for DTLS-only
> >>>>>>> b) Needs to specify TLS1.3 Column value.  I beieive the value
> >>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>> be empty as this is only applicable to DTLS 1.2.  To amke this
> >>>>>>> clear
> >>>>>>> we should ask for a note.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2) TLS ContentType Registry: tls12_cid
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We still a number assignment for this one.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> spt
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On May 23, 2019, at 13:59, Nick Sullivan <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This sounds good to me. However, there doesn't seem to be a
> >>>>>>>> way
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>> indicate that this extension is for DTLS only and not TLS. I
> >>>>>>>> don't
> >>>>>>>> think that's an issue, but I'm interested to hear if anyone
> >>>>>>>> else
> >>>>>>>> has
> >>>>>>>> an objection.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:35 AM Salz, Rich <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I don’t recall seeing this until now.  Explicitly copying Yoav
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> Nick.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I’m one of three and I support this.   Does this work?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Value 53
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> TLS 1.3 –
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Recommended Y
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> RFC TBD
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> From: Joseph Salowey <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>> Date: Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 12:23 PM
> >>>>>>>> To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "tls-reg-
> >>>>>>>> [e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>> Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]"
> >>>>>>>> <tls-
> >>>>>>>> [e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1141082] Fwd: Early code-
> >>>>>>>> point
> >>>>>>>> assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I haven't seen the messages appear in the tls-reg-review
> >>>>>>>> archives so
> >>>>>>>> I'm cc'ing them on this email to see if its stuck somewhere.
> >>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>> version of draft that I am preparing to send to the IESG is
> >>>>>>>> here
> >>>>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-
> >>>>>>>> 05.
> >>>>>>>> The authors have requested early code point assignment and
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> requires expert approval.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Joe
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:09 AM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
> >>>>>>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Joe,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We've sent this request to the experts at tls-reg-
> >>>>>>>> [e-mail] on
> >>>>>>>> 8 May 2019, and we pinged them again yesterday. We haven't
> >>>>>>>> heard
> >>>>>>>> back
> >>>>>>>> from the experts regarding this request, could you let us know
> >>>>>>>> if you
> >>>>>>>> still don't see it in the archives?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>>>> Sabrina
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu May 23 05:27:22 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Sabrina,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Am I supposed to ask the experts for a review or will IANA
> >>>>>>>>> initiate
> >>>>>>>>> this?
> >>>>>>>>> I don't think I've seen a request for review appear in the
> >>>>>>>>> archives
> >>>>>>>>> for the
> >>>>>>>>> [e-mail] yet.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Joe
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:54 PM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
> >>>>>>>>> [e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Joe,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We can make the ContentType registration in Section 8 now,
> >>>>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>> need to
> >>>>>>>>>> ask you how to fill in the "DTLS-OK" column.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Because the registration procedure for the ExtensionType
> >>>>>>>>>> Values
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> Specification Required, we need to ask the designated
> >>>>>>>>>> experts
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> review and
> >>>>>>>>>> approve the ExtensionType Value registration before we can
> >>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>> an
> >>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>> allocation.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sabrina Tanamal
> >>>>>>>>>> Senior IANA Services Specialist
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed May 08 14:25:55 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Michelle,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, this is a request for both.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Joe
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 6:51 AM Michelle Cotton via RT <
> >>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Joe,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies for the delay in my response.  I hope you are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> doing
> >>>>>>>>>>>> well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Quick question for your request below.  In the document
> >>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>>>>>> requests for parameter registrations.  Are you requesting
> >>>>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>> allocation
> >>>>>>>>>>>> for both?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --Michelle
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue Apr 23 04:51:06 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi IANA,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We have received a request for  early code point
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> assignment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-04.  The chairs believe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> draft
> >>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> stable.  Our AD, Ben also approves this early assignment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please
> >>>>>>>>>> let me
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> know if you need more information or have any questions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 7:12 PM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Early code-point assignment request for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Joseph Salowey <[e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: tls-chairs <[e-mail]>, <tls-reg-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [e-mail]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:32:00PM -0700, Joseph Salowey
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ben,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a request for early code point assignment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id.  We believe the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> stable
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no one has objected to the early code point announcement
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> list.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if you have any questions or need more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> information.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to see this go forward.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (You will send the actual request to IANA, not me,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> right?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, and sorry for the slow response,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ben
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >