[Tls-reg-review] draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F7412022A for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 04:08:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id srrW_W-PYOXL for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 04:08:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0B3120018 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 04:08:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1ED6300B24 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 07:08:08 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id xXpSHecuL2Le for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 07:08:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-108-51-198-163.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.198.163]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC979300460 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 07:08:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Message-Id: <9120CF3C-A2E1-46B2-BF44-60776D3094C2@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 07:08:07 -0500
To: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/uFBwBqzkg9mnpK3FrCMvRLWSL9w>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] draft-ietf-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 12:08:12 -0000

A single new ExtensionType value is to be registered:

Value: [ TBD-at-Registration ]
Extension Name: tls_cert_with_extern_psk
TLS 1.3: CH, SH
Recommended: N
Reference: [ RFC-to-be ]

Please let me know if this raises any concerns.

Russ