Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1141082] Early code-point assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

An excellent question :). When we are done there will be two code points assigned for this draft.

spt

> On Jun 24, 2019, at 18:54, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all, 
> 
> Does IANA need to make one or more assignments right now? We understand that we need approvals from at least two designated experts in order to proceed. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Sabrina
> 
> On Sun Jun 16 20:46:16 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
>> So looking at the registry, it seems that
>>  25  tls1.2 connection id y
>> Makes sense.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 6/16/19, 1:47 PM, "Sean Turner" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> So … it turns out there are two registry requests for this draft:
>> 
>> 1) TLS ExtensionType Values: connection_id
>> 
>> I think we got a number assigned here, but we need a couple of tweaks
>> in the IANA section (I will submit a PR):
>> 
>> a) Needs to request new column for DTLS-only
>> b) Needs to specify TLS1.3 Column value.  I beieive the value should
>> be empty as this is only applicable to DTLS 1.2.  To amke this clear
>> we should ask for a note.
>> 
>> 2) TLS ContentType Registry: tls12_cid
>> 
>> We still a number assignment for this one.
>> 
>> spt
>> 
>>> On May 23, 2019, at 13:59, Nick Sullivan <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This sounds good to me. However, there doesn't seem to be a way to
>>> indicate that this extension is for DTLS only and not TLS. I don't
>>> think that's an issue, but I'm interested to hear if anyone else has
>>> an objection.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:35 AM Salz, Rich <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I don’t recall seeing this until now.  Explicitly copying Yoav and
>>> Nick.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I’m one of three and I support this.   Does this work?
>>> 
>>> Value 53
>>> 
>>> TLS 1.3 –
>>> 
>>> Recommended Y
>>> 
>>> RFC TBD
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: Joseph Salowey <[e-mail]>
>>> Date: Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 12:23 PM
>>> To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "tls-reg-
>>> [e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
>>> Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <tls-
>>> [e-mail]>
>>> Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1141082] Fwd: Early code-point
>>> assignment request for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I haven't seen the messages appear in the tls-reg-review archives so
>>> I'm cc'ing them on this email to see if its stuck somewhere.   The
>>> version of draft that I am preparing to send to the IESG is here
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-05.
>>> The authors have requested early code point assignment and that
>>> requires expert approval.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Joe
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:09 AM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Joe,
>>> 
>>> We've sent this request to the experts at [e-mail] on
>>> 8 May 2019, and we pinged them again yesterday. We haven't heard back
>>> from the experts regarding this request, could you let us know if you
>>> still don't see it in the archives?
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Sabrina
>>> 
>>> On Thu May 23 05:27:22 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>> Hi Sabrina,
>>>> 
>>>> Am I supposed to ask the experts for a review or will IANA initiate
>>>> this?
>>>> I don't think I've seen a request for review appear in the archives
>>>> for the
>>>> [e-mail] yet.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Joe
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:54 PM Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
>>>> [e-mail]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We can make the ContentType registration in Section 8 now, but we
>>>>> need to
>>>>> ask you how to fill in the "DTLS-OK" column.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Because the registration procedure for the ExtensionType Values
>>>>> is
>>>>> Specification Required, we need to ask the designated experts to
>>>>> review and
>>>>> approve the ExtensionType Value registration before we can make
>>>>> an
>>>>> early
>>>>> allocation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sabrina Tanamal
>>>>> Senior IANA Services Specialist
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed May 08 14:25:55 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Michelle,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes, this is a request for both.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 6:51 AM Michelle Cotton via RT <
>>>>> [e-mail]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello Joe,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Apologies for the delay in my response.  I hope you are doing
>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Quick question for your request below.  In the document there
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>> requests for parameter registrations.  Are you requesting
>>>>>>> early
>>>>> allocation
>>>>>>> for both?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --Michelle
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue Apr 23 04:51:06 2019, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi IANA,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We have received a request for  early code point assignment
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-04.  The chairs believe
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>> draft
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> stable.  Our AD, Ben also approves this early assignment.
>>>>>>>> Please
>>>>> let me
>>>>>>>> know if you need more information or have any questions.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>>>>> From: Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 7:12 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Early code-point assignment request for
>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id
>>>>>>>> To: Joseph Salowey <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>>> Cc: tls-chairs <[e-mail]>, <tls-reg-
>>>>>>>> [e-mail]>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:32:00PM -0700, Joseph Salowey
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Ben,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> We have a request for early code point assignment
>>>>>>>>> for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id.  We believe the
>>>>>>>>> draft
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>> stable
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> no one has objected to the early code point announcement
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>> list.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Let me know if you have any questions or need more
>>>>>>>>> information.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm happy to see this go forward.
>>>>>>>> (You will send the actual request to IANA, not me, right?)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks, and sorry for the slow response,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ben
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>