Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Ext] Re: [TLS] (offline) Re: Draft for SM cipher suites used in TLS1.3

["Salz, Rich" <[e-mail]>]

Looking at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yang-tls-tls13-sm-suites-00, the IANA considerations in particular, I suggest the following:

             +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
             | Value | Description     | DTLS-OK | Reference |
             +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
             |  TBD1 | TLS_SM4_GCM_SM3 | No      | this RFC  |
             |       |                 |         |           |
             |  TBD2 | TLS_SM4_CCM_SM3 | No      | this RFC  |
             +-------+-----------------+---------+-----------+
Update the TLS Cipher Suites table to include
TBD1 is 0x00,0xC6
TBD2 is 0x00,0xC7
Note to the draft authors: This table is missing the “Recommended” column.  It should be filled in with “N”


               +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
               | Value | Description | DTLS-OK | Reference |
               +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
               |  TBD3 | sm2sig_sm3  | No      | this RFC  |
               +-------+-------------+---------+-----------+
TBD3 is 0x0708
Note to the draft authors: This table is missing the “Recommended” column. It should be filled in with “N”


        +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
        | Value | Description | DTLS-OK | Recommended | Reference |
        +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
        |  TBD4 | curveSM2    | No      | No          | this RFC  |
        +-------+-------------+---------+-------------+-----------+
TBD4 is 224
Note to the draft authors: This table should NOT have the “Recommended” column.