Re: [Tls-reg-review] Request to register values in TLS SignatureScheme registry

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 09 March 2020 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F43C3A1748; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C6m-norBDuDq; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 340223A171A; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id a25so9222991wrd.0; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=rKqpQV+xJxIhzzTOyMj7+omIDhQfSZyIe+x/9qqZL+I=; b=bpoAJ2cInxHusfX5fd2fKffeBOe3ODwBrhc3VkQBY4G4ywMLHzpvBEpVo0mc7QEwt+ rYh+W8mADCzMTYlaAbS/H/RM8/Rnz1b7ZVYHZCwQsrB5AS6PsDXfsoJmQEUmx8jV4biK HM8Nz0FuILemdkao5Gv4P69rR9Bq0dCUKagvbmiCnUKgH1S132Qxx7kdDIoCBw39Xq3Z 181d/qJ36xIeH7ZjCN3S74BoVhFaw8N7UJzooZnPVKWfI4qUBt6bOxLFgqP5jeLzvdVb TW+L4Aft2dyttLU6O/o7SOdOKU6/dn8hnokicHHobBaElJlqyJea0kgB3XSn8V/CWQ0J LbJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=rKqpQV+xJxIhzzTOyMj7+omIDhQfSZyIe+x/9qqZL+I=; b=q6UQtKLlsZRbNMQf5CQFHOPR6Gxqs8AZbTmEWK9nkmbRw1QQwOOBfCZag2U4jDUfbR qnMzolRMcUKvzSQ4Sjxt5wz9fmRpll4obgH6gfG1v4M1PXGibpfDjb84LCRiyXWLNgE4 bj2iuNXUaD1wqmc6dRoqazYUHB0aNL91GnmAbzz1tcLpF91iKGOxu1+7rw3TBsJw3QSo gQkw4fYJKW/NW9j7/lm2KCf4QSQiE8HiORBb2cDdJ7XrYOBlYwqeeB7Uf7YH0ok9PFA/ L2Tv8GfKjtTR25UqvVQHA1IGgRzDso6F2jBnn3D+H0pC2z5yMqRnbFTeJwNnEdTHuzx0 9CMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ26lwHD+8kDNTW/SkM6coC0Xv/rGyIlzgIDIDVb5AUuCOND2dWJ aPJbVKJl6IYTXdIRfmOHoHs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvtYL0uHiuOiX7ytbP/iWVVfE3e7nIls2OljY+43kkk84N0csXMld7PqXIq4ggfnuWe82WmCg==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e906:: with SMTP id f6mr21605836wrm.281.1583787604706; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y8sm972567wmj.22.2020.03.09.14.00.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <79B8C697-4F25-4B0F-9E10-F72E041F131B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C7C00BCF-AD6B-4F25-AF0C-1A47B6426482"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 23:00:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4297108D-1297-4387-945C-C6E746266CB2@gmail.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, David Benjamin <davidben=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>, tls-chairs <tls-chairs@ietf.org>, Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
References: <CAF8qwaDAQ6AjP6CJQFLWUdFvB4BA_28tNedHLXbBSOrR1mnPbA@mail.gmail.com> <A8009A51-5B56-4429-B376-CA3AC3522397@akamai.com> <20200308033624.GJ98042@kduck.mit.edu> <4297108D-1297-4387-945C-C6E746266CB2@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/zyvrUqPg6AH1hOfSWLMhyT6K1ME>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Request to register values in TLS SignatureScheme registry
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 21:00:21 -0000

And now adding IANA so that my and Rich’s approval actually does something…

Yoav

> On 8 Mar 2020, at 19:44, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Sorry about that.
> 
> Yes, I approve as well. 
> 
> I suggest the values 0x0420, 0x0520, and 0x0620  for the algorithms rsa_pkcs1_sha256_legacy, rsa_pkcs1_sha384_legacy, and rsa_pkcs1_sha512_legacy respectively.
> 
> The reason being that other algorithms also use 0x04xx, 0x05xx, and 0x06xx for things with sha256, sha384, and sha512, and setting 0x--20 for pkcs1_legacy is far enough from the recommended values to leave room for newer algorithms.
> 
> Yoav 
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2020, at 5:36, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu <mailto:kaduk@mit.edu>> wrote:
>> 
>> It looks like this is waiting for Nick and/or Yoav?
>> 
>> -Ben
>> 
>> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 04:37:28PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>> This request seems complete enough to me.  I approve.  I’ll let the next approver assign the codeponts :)
>>> 
>>> From: David Benjamin <davidben=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:davidben=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
>>> Date: Friday, February 28, 2020 at 5:52 PM
>>> To: "tls-reg-review@ietf.org <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>>, "tls-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:tls-chairs@ietf.org>" <tls-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:tls-chairs@ietf.org>>
>>> Cc: Adam Langley <agl@google.com <mailto:agl@google.com>>
>>> Subject: [Tls-reg-review] Request to register values in TLS SignatureScheme registry
>>> 
>>> I’d like to request SignatureScheme [1] code points for PKCS#1 v1.5 SignatureScheme types as specified in [2]. Not to be marked recommended or anything. Please let me know if you need additional information.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>>> [1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xhtml#tls-signaturescheme<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.iana.org_assignments_tls-2Dparameters_tls-2Dparameters.xhtml-23tls-2Dsignaturescheme&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=Ra8QBVclQgwq1Qpbl9KO3WMk1u5XZDNLp44lWigraWM&s=9GOiQNw10fizmVfHMnzf77Y1RjlWOas1glH1qzN_zRM&e=> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xhtml#tls-signaturescheme<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.iana.org_assignments_tls-2Dparameters_tls-2Dparameters.xhtml-23tls-2Dsignaturescheme&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=Ra8QBVclQgwq1Qpbl9KO3WMk1u5XZDNLp44lWigraWM&s=9GOiQNw10fizmVfHMnzf77Y1RjlWOas1glH1qzN_zRM&e=>>
>>> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-davidben-tls13-pkcs1-00#section-5<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Ddavidben-2Dtls13-2Dpkcs1-2D00-23section-2D5&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=Ra8QBVclQgwq1Qpbl9KO3WMk1u5XZDNLp44lWigraWM&s=fVUKpTNwu5_mRT24j5LtdLS9UFo_ZnPkBnlCIHBBY3k&e=> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-davidben-tls13-pkcs1-00#section-5<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Ddavidben-2Dtls13-2Dpkcs1-2D00-23section-2D5&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=Ra8QBVclQgwq1Qpbl9KO3WMk1u5XZDNLp44lWigraWM&s=fVUKpTNwu5_mRT24j5LtdLS9UFo_ZnPkBnlCIHBBY3k&e=>>
>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tls-reg-review mailing list
>>> tls-reg-review@ietf.org <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tls-reg-review mailing list
>> tls-reg-review@ietf.org <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review
>