Re: [TLS] Justification

Michael D'Errico <mike-list@pobox.com> Wed, 12 May 2010 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mike-list@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9EE3A6900 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.595, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJ8vRYlYjjUu for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com [208.72.237.25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72673A69A4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2010 11:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A306B28C0; Wed, 12 May 2010 14:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=V00PJaS2jmC0 V3SgPnTg2xhZ5gM=; b=rydri42vC+W5+EY1OgGX50yIHnG4fvs/BRBR19ZhIcJH IOu10uR3oifzY1RW+KmqVEDB7DaiQgr4o1iBCy45mfbtFtX+r0d+NeZLW5H9ZKhL 3kQdFIkC7Xtj1n/fiDtGSf73DDeWrOcbCARoiRihMzKpxAlB4vA8OlphNB/eC5Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qIjLvN aoJUTW0QZ/qAajUpggRX9+ZKXTaISwkth0rbwk/iMIrn/P/X9U7bcpu/CHxpMQ4R 2X9wZJ70NKbqC8JckrV0LfLKPih3VXrDvFdKN8saYwh3Fm8Kcf/BBOs54nbpwoV2 xesKUAT685s2b6xzTFRzuF5X2FUHraRliq2EU=
Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71908B28BD; Wed, 12 May 2010 14:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from administrators-macbook-pro.local (unknown [24.234.114.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 568E6B28B1; Wed, 12 May 2010 14:22:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BEAF1F8.4030004@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 11:22:48 -0700
From: Michael D'Errico <mike-list@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@oracle.com>
References: <4BE9B856.40000@extendedsubset.com> <20100511200728.GW9429@oracle.com> <4BE9CC88.6040103@extendedsubset.com> <87aas5sbzy.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <4BEAC145.60607@pobox.com> <n2va84d7bc61005120811o737c2011i27f9d40e88417539@mail.gmail.com> <004901caf1ea$783e23a0$68ba6ae0$@briansmith.org> <p2xa84d7bc61005120858v2ce68cf7xe6ddf559faf4d4b0@mail.gmail.com> <4BEAE4CF.7070205@pobox.com> <p2ga84d7bc61005121033n169fc0fdyb2bc94b504f3fc2c@mail.gmail.com> <20100512180814.GI9429@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100512180814.GI9429@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6A2F2B2C-5DF3-11DF-8775-D033EE7EF46B-38729857!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Justification
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 18:46:22 -0000

Would they be https URL's?  Then you would have an infinite-recursion
problem....

Mike



Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 01:33:08PM -0400, Adam Langley wrote:
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Michael D'Errico <mike-list@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> What is this three packet limit you speak of?
>> TCP's initial congestion window is three frames (for now). So a TLS
>> server which needs more than three frames to send ServerHello through
>> to ServerHelloDone will have to wait additional round trips for
>> acknowledgments from the client.
> 
> I think this argues for using URLs for cacheable objects.
> 
> Nico