Re: [TLS] (draft) WG adoption call: draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart

Thanks, Sean.

Just to confirm, the WG -00 I-D will be essentially identical to the lasted
individual submission, and then we'll work on the changes for -01, right?

I've actually just left for a vacation, so it will be around a week and a
half before I can submit the -00 draft. But then we're not in any kind of
rush for this one.

Bodo

2015-04-16 12:21 GMT-04:00 Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>:

> Based on list discussion we’re going to go adopt this draft as a WG.
>
> Bodo please submit a WG version of this draft so we can begin addressing
> Brian’s comments in the WG -01 version.
>
> Thanks everybody!
>
> spt
>
> On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:20, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > There’s been some interested expressed in having
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bmoeller-tls-falsestart/ adopted as
> a TLS WG item.  If you would like for this draft to become a WG document,
> and you are willing to review drafts as it moves through the process please
> indicate as much on this thread.  If you are opposed to this being a WG
> document, please say so (and say why). Thanks in advance.
> >
> > J&S
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>