[TLS] max_fragment_length values (was: RE: I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt)
<Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com> Mon, 14 June 2010 14:48 UTC
Return-Path: <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636443A699C for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TKxCbdOpRYbv for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A393A6989 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o5EEkusl031692; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:47:20 +0300
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:47:17 +0300
Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.22]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:47:17 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.6]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:47:12 +0300
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.86]) by nok-am1mhub-02.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.6]) with mapi; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:47:11 +0200
From: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
To: jsalowey@cisco.com, nmav@gnutls.org
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:47:10 +0200
Thread-Topic: max_fragment_length values (was: RE: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt)
Thread-Index: AcsKOP/RsnIDOOhcQbCFz13joF5ZAABP+nzQABXQIhA=
Message-ID: <808FD6E27AD4884E94820BC333B2DB775BC20FD1E8@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <20100612034512.CB07A3A687D@core3.amsl.com> <4C13953A.8040107@gnutls.org> <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE50AB1DA00@xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE50AB1DA00@xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2010 14:47:12.0226 (UTC) FILETIME=[790E1420:01CB0BD0]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] max_fragment_length values (was: RE: I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:48:05 -0000
Joseph Salowey wrote: > At this point I don't want to open up other sections of the document > for changes as it is fairly far along and we need to publish the > document. I don't see overwhelming support to change it. I agree, especially since we would need to define a new extension; this text seems to prevent adding new values in backwards-compatible manner: If a server receives a maximum fragment length negotiation request for a value other than the allowed values, it MUST abort the handshake with an "illegal_parameter" alert. Best regards, Pasi
- [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt Internet-Drafts
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Blumenthal, Uri - 0668 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
- [TLS] max_fragment_length values (was: RE: I-D Ac… Pasi.Eronen
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- [TLS] DTLS and large messages t.petch
- Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Juho Vähä-Herttua
- Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Michael Tüxen
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Blumenthal, Uri - 0668 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages t.petch
- Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Michael Tüxen
- Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Pasi.Eronen
- Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Michael Tüxen
- Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Peter Gutmann