Re: [TLS] Deprecating TLS 1.0, 1.1 and SHA1 signature algorithms

Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com> Tue, 12 January 2016 00:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078ED1A1AE1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:31:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XbXplqkqx6xE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:30:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0139.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A17B1A92AF for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:30:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Hu/wvHoQOo3dOTj7EpT46ErTssOH7/CIInSFXGFPBQo=; b=EwHRc4D+HWrXIkcUpwfH0LP7bQFHNb+JFcgHeGMxYa8JhWWzsw2l7sdzNxY0dTXS2Y4oWVpRlHz0b+wzOHFIO3I5AfR+KD/ou0etub6fsAGUnjSC4BFRoIZnN+f8LpYQiy12Zjy1BVAj2HxYNrbyOOanYaCuc2DXzmgL3050/Fg=
Received: from BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.81.142) by BLUPR03MB1393.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.81.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.361.13; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:30:52 +0000
Received: from BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.81.142]) by BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.81.142]) with mapi id 15.01.0361.006; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:30:52 +0000
From: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Deprecating TLS 1.0, 1.1 and SHA1 signature algorithms
Thread-Index: AQHRTJ4m/d32IOQTx0qUA0UaDUeUnZ728x2AgAADioCAAAFHQIAAAoIAgAAM9XA=
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:30:52 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB1396B81F15F11DE05A0839888CCA0@BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20160111183017.GA12243@roeckx.be> <CAF8qwaC-u-8HCTFegx+yhwSQibrrPULX0i6UaopfQrzaMS7gew@mail.gmail.com> <BLU177-W18E00AB27F0A359CF4AF51C3C90@phx.gbl> <BLUPR03MB13967009706DBFAE8DEF1E8D8CC90@BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20160111234314.GD18704@mournblade.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160111234314.GD18704@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:8::1d2]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR03MB1393; 5:MkCwf6VYoipEav8QQezPuL9uPzzarm3XsnkrkQZOs7mBiRT91ozHMZTFyB+TGBxt+SYRbH1qPjRWz2DZGdmqq/278G4/I0CaBXN9XPjE446EydeUneb1OMSD4ZFEHJUkGK9erPqBc0Ei/QKJQ8rYmg==; 24:QlXMYtdotg4lk4HbLREku6Yzq27q3FqD+a+r9XPT2NxMYGP0rQyPxUOW+Y87euOnpcjWc0Wg748vajzuM1P0e6a7Zd/y5ILNX7sq2XFnx80=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR03MB1393;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8e71b1cc-cadd-4e24-a63b-08d31ae7a0b9
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR03MB139320E12C7462618DD5E3AE8CCA0@BLUPR03MB1393.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(189930954265078);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(520078)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BLUPR03MB1393; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR03MB1393;
x-forefront-prvs: 081904387B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(24454002)(13464003)(189002)(377454003)(86362001)(1730700002)(86612001)(74316001)(97736004)(50986999)(107886002)(93886004)(5005710100001)(5003600100002)(76176999)(10400500002)(101416001)(2900100001)(76576001)(77096005)(87936001)(81156007)(106116001)(105586002)(99286002)(40100003)(110136002)(5001960100002)(106356001)(575784001)(5002640100001)(450100001)(54356999)(586003)(92566002)(6116002)(19580395003)(102836003)(19580405001)(122556002)(15975445007)(1096002)(189998001)(2351001)(33656002)(2950100001)(10090500001)(1220700001)(10290500002)(11100500001)(2501003)(5004730100002)(2906002)(8990500004)(5008740100001)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR03MB1393; H:BLUPR03MB1396.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Jan 2016 00:30:52.3785 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR03MB1393
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/-vI7tvXmUzV9g8JE74wxkFDkCO4>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Deprecating TLS 1.0, 1.1 and SHA1 signature algorithms
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:31:00 -0000

> (Please let's not re-open that thread).
Indeed, let's agree to disagree on this.

Cheers,

Andrei

-----Original Message-----
From: TLS [mailto:tls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 3:43 PM
To: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Deprecating TLS 1.0, 1.1 and SHA1 signature algorithms

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:38:25PM +0000, Andrei Popov wrote:

> Yes, per RFC 5246: 
> "   If the client provided a "signature_algorithms" extension, then all
>    certificates provided by the server MUST be signed by a
>    hash/signature algorithm pair that appears in that extension."

Yes.  Though for the record, and as discussed ad nauseam before, this is a bug in the RFC, and should not be implemented as written.
(Please let's not re-open that thread).

Ideally, at some point SChannel will implement the TLS 1.3 draft bug fix also for TLS 1.2.

-- 
	Viktor.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.ietf.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ftls&data=01%7c01%7cAndrei.Popov%40microsoft.com%7cf0ce972e5c7b41e5454f08d31ae0fe01%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=1s56rzccDOpU1SudCjc4k1LeVmeVsPxqy6XeGDZhQTM%3d