Re: [TLS] Should CCM_8 CSs be Recommended?

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Thu, 05 October 2017 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779F2132D96 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4D5R3e__Exyi for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93AB1133210 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m16so5520629iod.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=m6F/H9SFCy7QhF0uguNtc/r2G9wevrHs/BGouwhUr7M=; b=bvxVTFAA74nFFACTlgyz2+mMoq489ec+vK6f9sIPkDoDaolY4Lt1Sal0u+Ya7RXetF YyJ+C2oY21miK3ohSLnC4oOhQnlEqHC2lK2PY/In/VEUh2Ig++SF8yAhKlJXMQ4Lw28P GXHCQO8EeJSsU1omALYJp9NSHDRfjonSWunX8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=m6F/H9SFCy7QhF0uguNtc/r2G9wevrHs/BGouwhUr7M=; b=bDUoaecJ92EXhK2NFr0pexX/l0dV5BWiNtsuvL9YOVZH7sAVlzEaqxUiepLbGREqfn zz9m6lCS0l2OYWP0Vd/UhK6sPUnHPjn4IWaVB+igsvMbg4kpWVpGXr/ihrlwGDeVBSmL 9RKIB1PG1DKK3fzHJJQuspvIp410NFN2TRIPvvQVzw/86QkIHVvba9nBKqbv6x3b6E2F hnfmUbF6s+e7xOYdLB+FJihqFLEnCgClpXPJFy6etNuB/siXvTWnjbSBsSoEfPE7ZXuG C2A9liHr0YzuH+Nn9UTMHJYTgdNl+EjfwIA59zUM0H+DgsGZrpcLh4glyuNkYIZXyvz2 300g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXBeqORxvHu6rQ2CrJsC5XSCnWTLi8RpvI/42zCG7nL83JYteOL xUEU5mPZVuoapKngA2lV7D0Djg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QB57vRHINQ3uTtxV8N37eltNgGiT/Yy5g+WyoJNxu9Jejot5CkxWU+WhwFKeu3iQZ3YiQaDtg==
X-Received: by 10.107.84.3 with SMTP id i3mr38387083iob.52.1507221787813; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.173] (vpn.snozzages.com. [204.42.252.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 77sm8601182iok.41.2017.10.05.09.43.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <1B6398D7-695F-492D-889F-2E006C596F33@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:43:01 -0700
Cc: Joe Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <860D5B0C-6700-463C-837E-CB7098440E74@sn3rd.com>
References: <CA26DC83-9524-4CDA-910A-7FDCBF73F849@sn3rd.com> <A77ED838-9A38-41AB-B063-FC6BE6996373@akamai.com> <CAOgPGoAH_-i8dpX0Df=bcrS9t_LMi0N+6T-tpr+ybkA3sfn8tg@mail.gmail.com> <1B6398D7-695F-492D-889F-2E006C596F33@akamai.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/03D55FRqBVbJwB0cRI4lC3IDF7k>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Should CCM_8 CSs be Recommended?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:44:25 -0000

I put this in a PR:
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates/pull/46/files

spt

> On Oct 4, 2017, at 12:37, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>; wrote:
> 
> Perhaps change the list “to” to “intended for” ?