Re: [TLS] [CHANNEL-BINDING] Updates to draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings, take two (PLEASE REVIEW)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 22 March 2010 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lunohod.baikonur@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003C53A6AFD; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.644
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.644 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.203, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33DgwWGrIFCA; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D7028C167; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so2787431wyb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=okvpAElw07yZlAbIrh0acy5goXMbu4rIWdw5tHVFxsQ=; b=HXePLsd/Ln/UXHU36b2+XeDEdAwQsd/6VX71+OqxeJpVLuccOVX2hllMyNT7Tv4tH2 1jlLM5RChVDpdpLtpBD1EQf7CxRa1pd6gZdbtzQVgD88zJHCp5ieBV0GlcXwP0z9L94L skJYkKGOr6jet0HuqZXphE+k9jJ0SZAq55QnI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=krCuhvWAtXeH+Cud5AZ3uHYqNpqqfFHSCmVXQDDYpXv7wMRRQt6EuEYrSOc4ILx6mx lTcksTpfCvIw9mMVz9UNiUS8VqbCIJd1zW64U6Wb3A/PAxyH4u5X85VSW7DKf3pdvUm6 gKulMJZHlw112nZ3Y+w5hVaM+braOdhXj7GD0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: lunohod.baikonur@googlemail.com
Received: by 10.216.160.144 with SMTP id u16mr1939328wek.98.1269301702805; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20100322232150.GB21244@Sun.COM>
References: <20100317231522.GA18167@Sun.COM> <20100322232150.GB21244@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:22 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6de3aa2ebe334e70
Message-ID: <29d3c4cb1003221648x424bb946i2b043542926396b6@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: channel-binding@ietf.org, Pasi Eronen <pasi.eronen@nokia.com>, tls@ietf.org, sasl@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] [CHANNEL-BINDING] Updates to draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings, take two (PLEASE REVIEW)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:48:13 -0000

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Nicolas Williams
<Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> wrote:
> I've posted -08 of draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-altman-tls-channel-bindings-08.txt
>
> This version adopts the form of tls-unique that MSFT has implemented and
> deployed, which is backwards-incompatible with the original.  I expect
> this will be a controversial change.  A new IETF Last Call will be
> necessary, and publication of GS2 and SCRAM will have to be held up
> until the IANA registration of tls-unique is updated.
>
> Pasi,
>
> Please review this change and begin a new IETF Last Call at your
> earliest convenience.  Thanks,

After talking to Pasi/Tim/Sean, I will be taking over AD sponsoring of
this document.
So I will be starting IETF LC.
But of course I would encourage Pasi to review this.