Re: [TLS] Encrypted SNI

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sun, 06 December 2015 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA3A1A8732 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 06:50:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bu3EJyqjX6fO for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 06:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com (mail-yk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CC851A8731 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 06:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykdr82 with SMTP id r82so169880650ykd.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 06:50:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Txwa3pGOGHQJDj5NJ0g4iwJEyKC320Gj8GBVy5qi3KQ=; b=Ki2XeezASVoyziyBX/ye3bSBmgQ91fndBboloKD0ZmZ8LQCI94tb6ZxVnHTjYphLlG lxfpynjJU9EJSe9Sty3yA7vHfORX6CZvcPiP+fROSZ0zyeVBnAK1845gaqlXC/BRqdPc m2an6sL79pv2PxizT5ShsSaKR6RP+2NFmEksRHy/4Wb/EB7cCSd+6h1l9LQq2azH8nkH x7/wDWpd5mB7mJOWffi3WtkdiJL2MJVRJvr8QREqHRxaOGRxlC2MrNljAndhJND95xuB MmqkHzsAgOTp+9z4a7a4Dv3WLi+U2mFE+FU7RPVs2LcUfKuN03x5aHcU/vUcvFfhVvxx sDog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Txwa3pGOGHQJDj5NJ0g4iwJEyKC320Gj8GBVy5qi3KQ=; b=boovGY4tTX8zMMxzcES2Yk67E7wGVx3ZsmA4QaAw/pE0JFI6jsb3lS8zFf3EIt/gx0 vHk6WdTld0GSgtGlsEIFHY3pkyINez5TqJnNHNedkG4A52lE/Ll3c/eod1QlcummTwOP /t3aSHee8BFrJtd8Sb/8/mqoTU2dM/vbDYJNmo/BUYRMlVaHuSLbebBxkiyALn6sFtBC Gn83yGTC5PAvnfPXIvZ5bqsD5MkeFRkqzvCFivE0zLIOAd+cF81fvBocZYYKaw/ClXuq 1HJsjGW5+uiasiFPnUxHzcerP+XnHk7Kb31vRnz1b4cb9WRHG5od4ZHRsmO2aixUdUGd xDXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDHgppVZKAJ7l+asp0dlhBuJj3TgKtJnR+PX2QchiJJOk8hO866SnFtXdgCIb+lZlqWFHN
X-Received: by 10.129.73.198 with SMTP id w189mr20857307ywa.223.1449413431817; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 06:50:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.249.197 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 06:49:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7c34bff9bf1d4d9897802a6e98cfedb0@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CABcZeBPFAp4hD3ykY9pAA4=ELsAkNoa2yDhaoiSP917v5XgAiw@mail.gmail.com> <36a3b8e463f444ec9fd10c552ce702c4@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CABcZeBOh==pQgy_5OTJkNU+WfCcFpoXWLODGWTxDW78PK6EwqQ@mail.gmail.com> <7c34bff9bf1d4d9897802a6e98cfedb0@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 06:49:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPmhGPqHqimsDsBQQTZQUXEHJd7CGX===3hSmhY1916TA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114dc814bca6b205263bdcf8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/0i2E_pn9Jin5UlOMoe8qvNSGrNI>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Encrypted SNI
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:50:33 -0000

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> > I'm not sure I understand the design you're suggesting.
>
> Does the EncryptedExtensions contain the entire hello for the "next hop"?
>

No. It (at most) says "the stuff that is post-handshake is actually a
ClientHello for the next hop". I.e., it's literally TLS in TLS.

-Ekr