Re: [TLS] WG adoption + early code point assignment: draft-mavrogiannopoulos-chacha-tls

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 20 May 2015 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F761A01A5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 04:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qijr8d5_u_xk for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 04:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A60A1A016A for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 04:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so151073096wic.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 04:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Mfu/dC3OacQtNWLzGqxPPl2Dk2lM/BtNe2aklb3/9Yk=; b=nmzkxKusvAax0LXVDakrLGKvVVj5YE6Sh1x8rTdOWfFAbmbpXQwaLTXjEB47/8SM7X TEeKcKUzCynKYciK8YY4Xhu8Lw34pULVYKeJ5pNf+Wq9YYEuNDRJt9I/XHSiVqq57Bms dtB126iDvurFqIUfKx1ndUt/dGYj/i0S72xsmg5oPRqXoEGA73mf3c1add7SjsL04rS4 uUQspq9PIgev6SOaxggIzlA0zhZ/BMSSD27m/8WOS9aWplQxrAo1Ir75uesyqPh9Mcln B382i47nUxGUeAdRytuJjTfylf9Bq8To+HX3AUnZb0zOwJMWInfKwSp7DBlzerb0/NNU x/zQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.2.47 with SMTP id 15mr64377970wjr.101.1432121041122; Wed, 20 May 2015 04:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.234] ([2.54.11.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id js3sm26318152wjc.5.2015.05.20.04.23.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 May 2015 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <555C6ECE.2000201@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:23:58 +0300
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
References: <FD8B7C3F-C3DD-4367-B84D-26B9907F1B9D@ieca.com> <3FCBCBD5-9295-4A8D-BD27-71377B6B8E7C@gmail.com> <CABkgnnUYZFb5zAVUgQ4LHBBt0cECHoQS4dEofmmH1M5Bn8HZDQ@mail.gmail.com> <567925460.1076064.1432105081320.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <555C33F6.4020402@cs.tcd.ie> <555C6B9D.2060302@gmail.com> <1432120843.2926.0.camel@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1432120843.2926.0.camel@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/0i_z6hdgCyAk_eogwZnW9vcprxQ>
Cc: IETF TLS Working Group <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption + early code point assignment: draft-mavrogiannopoulos-chacha-tls
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 11:24:03 -0000

I cannot, sorry. But a diff between -00 and -08 shows (among other 
things) differences in the order of data items that are covered by the 
Poly1305 tag.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 05/20/2015 02:20 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 14:10 +0300, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>> At ipsecme, we had a few incompatible changes between WG adoption of our
>> own chacha draft, and WGLC. So I would recommend against early
>> registration altogether.
>
> Could you summarize the changes done for ipsecme in case they are
> relevant for this draft as well?
>
> regards,
> Nikos
>
>