[TLS] Re: draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement

Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com> Mon, 09 December 2024 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <neried7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CBAC1DC7ED for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.856
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.856 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7NFYT-1tMKz for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCB8C1D531D for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d3f65844deso2419081a12.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:32:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1733776337; x=1734381137; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IBSo98SPYIeXRKoa5L8FpB/viuMR5qso9mj0BAnwZpk=; b=Y2kElwMImQEcBM4ryb1il33QtbB/EJRDGKD4Xw1Kw/yG+yIh6r9LxlJTfU7WwNiChJ LtFmdkjYMgLGopdCOHFxEt6i7TNow6kYKMN5P48FfNjdvBEEbW4934b2XKDriihNE2zf nLuE9/58r2JGJxWOGOO+//eiFkw+n/wwhY8mg+3c8kKvZPkj1u8hB4KUdGGM0ys/+oQV I0xiWLPFtY1rs5m6S4ldxfCj5/JMdj2xOXZYyUiLCtECWD7qxBdNHMCPvw/M0rEIpGOD dMYpYp6DuKB6oBU3VNnlfUx8itvnRijAx5vfwnxGJw9CFvsPRIvTaiu5m98cYQm1UW/7 sZNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733776337; x=1734381137; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=IBSo98SPYIeXRKoa5L8FpB/viuMR5qso9mj0BAnwZpk=; b=K3LFYkmxAZATH5fY37MD5s6cqYsXswJ2Fpp3BUNvXVwZfR1lERi0nrWiwVO/Qc1hXs hio05oxsacu5vNr9OK6M6Zf3k9va6NhUzWHheYXmXDrXdlCqtWG2AToNckjLtys886VK VBccT5brsAeiiQPo09ecuSCgOuy1/Q8r8QCHdkNqu+p/DaxA0dn1gA8zeevV7ocI3JHw 2IbyEKtQVUhMn1twXBO/vSHE6NfBf2r411gvyl9Dq40XLOU0FefD2WX9zyZ9SJ9DsKxO kso9gohrh2PZCOZFoFRZPjBNoQNzNFOpcpo9rlFilhFylnl4FEhaWDOLYx49V8pPa1R/ SBKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxaioUPEHOs+FolMbDgN5dtwKBeNksOJAByU5zg/+JrReMDMcyN zAAXeO9mPDk8x50zVOVb2eEERIr62nEG8He8QLNNUpvB1D17ahnOWeTTay+UytgjnZIPaa671i+ 61J9Pvm4KQ9vcp1zerihFPfSF6oMb3Vev
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuoMo5V9rDqmfE1lxBJshRZGJrHSMBRVgRlq7nHODqlKoXo9K0/ASu0FP8uPRF z35Ta5bpWI41E8miDqitk9sz02KqclA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IERWEWX3b4naLr6mmpyCp/JbgNqn6UOyA5PjUED8f+DGyV6ZVAtWqFYvsFiMIGYPn3a/orZfcrXCpSzUaCX3IM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4316:b0:5d3:e8d1:a46 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d3e8d10ceemr9945878a12.30.1733776336240; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:32:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CH0PR11MB5444342A5C29C5C5BCCF9BA3C1302@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR11MB5444342A5C29C5C5BCCF9BA3C1302@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 15:31:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFR824xUVnkSr4bBF-su_CVvYY+e2Kkt2WU47_73y=QaMDsVcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" <sfluhrer=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a4488f0628dc428f"
Message-ID-Hash: OE43KW4L62GVGVZLFMUKC6VNEGILUZBI
X-Message-ID-Hash: OE43KW4L62GVGVZLFMUKC6VNEGILUZBI
X-MailFrom: neried7@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/19DuZw7VySKwsXJLdfB3Nw9D1BY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

Pursuant to this thread, preliminary support for MLKEM768-only has been
merged into rustls (I contributed):

https://github.com/rustls/rustls/pull/2259

On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 4:10 PM Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> How do we proceed with this draft?
>
>
>
> This draft is quite boring (which is good from a cryptographical
> perspective); it just says ‘take ML-KEM and insert it as a key agreement
> into TLS in the obvious way’.
>
>
>
> I understand that people want to discuss the hybrid KEM draft more
> (because there are more options there) – can we at least get the less
> controversial part done?
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>