[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 08 June 2025 07:40 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7803E3249AC3 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 00:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="nIgVagOR"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="k8runx8N"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FgbHutG_GXq for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 00:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 847BE3249AB8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 00:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.phl.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5439813802BA for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 03:40:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 08 Jun 2025 03:40:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1749368445; x=1749454845; bh=lV8jF9Ga28uPIB1cZJH7pdi/ymGUKVZVxW3 B8VPumxU=; b=nIgVagORWw9UiL9WzQuNldjw6oz1cfWLVOeANsKaO/Bkag1kCNy CYuw7h8/naqRoIsxS9IcnH1nxjtr6X31LD9RtU1tY8RdDwQsTifMqkPSYYzPL1df sujLR3cqfT/Q8rdG2ctGrMkpUuTO5AjVEBQgLtqVJNQV1BXSKABSs/QW49e/zKpf a/eHRsyTCRNOzZB6b71ncP/KtuneP0Fj92KlMjx9K2+UL5j5MBGEICmZRNxiK7XD Cds1gKTB+1x8YN+E2HSuefxmLMvADifg+wYZnqgUq2u7WkY8Ye1FEk0FrhzCoSEb vYFGptR1mJdK79eCGNqZvmJEHI85kQXrPBQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1749368445; x=1749454845; bh=l V8jF9Ga28uPIB1cZJH7pdi/ymGUKVZVxW3B8VPumxU=; b=k8runx8NQhyH1cIKv ERAibkXvLGFrJaXVR2t3XLZAErLILb/O+F/SgsQGcUsqKTavUFRa27hlFuwNv5Ns VkrkgbpRJMhk1Q24/LXNPHkAnVt3CloOUI3TOAZu2OL9Drs7mUKlsAoCsTV7Pty4 FWJ83XH3VQQFsQRzgdf4EoDMWX+uMHZQc4gLjNrIc9NIOFaz1EWscTeMRGgyvhyv ttI2pMyxC5wh/ZQpgzvbpjGDcM1HVNpz1pzc+e3gEooPXg7nZxBXFAF4TA9h8pN7 qzvdCrxRNHd7sr+B3nvNiVueHNkn50FoR4aSOIw4G8xwfCt/rvY/F7R0QlTHBH2I OmeGQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:fT5FaIPq_VsL013Zt2MWZEQutvWjyr-TC_7iGhghG0uWeaR5M1G5EQ> <xme:fT5FaO-niF7ZtPuQ8OHvsNDd56pJZ2nmIw1HJg6A5GTIf0GLDyujCAt5fmCtSM4y6 1zj3SToXvqHPcEVuQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:fT5FaPSSxBCvjG6NE6K7JSwjsk1Xg0DtWgIvASscT788qTeldzCm2q9bgQ93Vzw9sHlRRnPk7IDFqPYfDAXbtlEDu7Dl8KpImZIclM7MFYNhDVgqySRcN8ist7owsbn0kskKWqrp>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugdejheeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfih gvlhguucdlgeelmdenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeft vghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopg hnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvddu teejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrih hnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtpdhnsggprh gtphhtthhopedupdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehtlhhssehivght fhdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:fT5FaAs2jRW46zZ0V4SrOsd3LMqErJXO376eGkMAVaLGNmCmmd3riw> <xmx:fT5FaAepFaRdNYoF5dlOqiABGqsEi7ZkhT98cNI7t6s1Fa_q4L0hTQ> <xmx:fT5FaE3eb7gVJI7zLCy-h2qWNzKSptIO29QjANZUIRK8CHdl8X8YIQ> <xmx:fT5FaE9m9DBGBKFCIcbp7-e9qa8WZA7FR52Z187HMPjdvBeExnXXFg> <xmx:fT5FaHwgThkuBUdycKyIrTZw6-lLCTA9sVokb7OGETsse91rWwu7l4dr>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 03:40:44 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============8068162157936802389=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20250608074045.847BE3249AB8@mail2.ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2025 00:40:45 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: FZPDAJNE73ANDPGWAPIAOYXJ2GFSBA3R
X-Message-ID-Hash: FZPDAJNE73ANDPGWAPIAOYXJ2GFSBA3R
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1A_AD5IDX5zikLZrl6ByktjAKqU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
Issues
------
* tlswg/dtls-rrc (+6/-4/💬16)
6 issues created:
- OPSDIR review (redux) (by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/86
- Section 5: Also, I think there should be a MUST statement (by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/84
- Figure 2: This seems fairly complex figure to say: (by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/83
- Section 9: The security consideration need to discuss the consequences of (by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/82
- Artart review (by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/81
- OPSDIR review (by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/79
6 issues received 16 new comments:
- #86 OPSDIR review (redux) (1 by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/86
- #84 Section 5 missing MUST (4 by boaks, thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/84
- #83 Figure 2 is complex (3 by boaks, thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/83
- #82 security implication of predictable cookie (6 by boaks, thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/82
- #79 OPSDIR review (1 by boaks)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/79
- #78 RRC Message Type Sub-registry should be Expert Review (1 by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/78
4 issues closed:
- security implication of predictable cookie https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/82
- Figure 2 is complex https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/83
- RRC Message Type Sub-registry should be Expert Review https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/78
- OPSDIR review https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/79
* tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-0/💬0)
1 issues created:
- Clarification on Table 3 (by muhammad-usama-sardar)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1393
* tlswg/tls-key-update (+1/-0/💬5)
1 issues created:
- Missing references in introduction (by muhammad-usama-sardar)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-update/issues/27
2 issues received 5 new comments:
- #26 Term "Forward Secrecy" is confusing (3 by hannestschofenig)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-update/issues/26
- #22 Extended Key Update replaces regular Key Update (2 by hannestschofenig)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-update/issues/22
Pull requests
-------------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+0/-0/💬1)
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #655 Remove spurious application profile text (1 by ekr)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/655
* tlswg/dtls-rrc (+3/-2/💬3)
3 pull requests submitted:
- Add an "Operational Considerations" section (by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/87
- ARTART review (by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/85
- Joe Clarke's editorial suggestions (by thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/80
2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #80 Joe Clarke's editorial suggestions (1 by hannestschofenig)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/80
- #75 align with rfc8447bis (+ DE rather than standards action) (2 by hannestschofenig, thomas-fossati)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/75
2 pull requests merged:
- align with rfc8447bis (+ DE rather than standards action)
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/75
- Joe Clarke's editorial suggestions
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/80
* tlswg/rfc8447bis (+2/-1/💬0)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Address Amanda's comments (by seanturner)
https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/88
- Address Mike's comment (by seanturner)
https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/87
1 pull requests merged:
- Address Mike's comment
https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/87
* tlswg/rfc8773bis (+2/-1/💬0)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Update draft-ietf-tls-8773bis.xml (by russhousley)
https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8773bis/pull/11
- Perhaps a typo? (by muhammad-usama-sardar)
https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8773bis/pull/10
1 pull requests merged:
- Update draft-ietf-tls-8773bis.xml
https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8773bis/pull/11
* tlswg/sslkeylogfile (+0/-1/💬0)
1 pull requests merged:
- Some editorial tweaks suggested by Mike Bishop
https://github.com/tlswg/sslkeylogfile/pull/31
* tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-1/💬12)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Clarify PSKBinderEntry (by muhammad-usama-sardar)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1392
3 pull requests received 12 new comments:
- #1392 Clarify Key for PSKBinderEntry (4 by ekr, muhammad-usama-sardar)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1392
- #1382 rpk misbinding and clarification (7 by ekr, ms-s)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1382
- #1381 external psk selfie attack (1 by ms-s)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1381
1 pull requests merged:
- rpk misbinding and clarification
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1382
* tlswg/tls-key-share-prediction (+1/-0/💬0)
1 pull requests submitted:
- add missing verb (by jschauma)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-share-prediction/pull/13
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression
* https://github.com/tlswg/dnssec-chain-extension
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-deprecate-obsolete-kex
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-cert-abridge
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ech-keylogfile
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-grease
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis
* https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis
* https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8773bis
* https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption
* https://github.com/tlswg/sslkeylogfile
* https://github.com/tlswg/sslv3-diediedie
* https://github.com/tlswg/super-jumbo-record-limit
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-share-prediction
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-update
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-record-limit
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls12-frozen
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-pkcs1
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-rfc
--
To have a summary like this sent to your list, see: https://github.com/ietf-github-services/activity-summary
- [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Dra… Repository Activity Summary Bot