Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7803E3249AC3 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 00:40:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.398 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="nIgVagOR"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="k8runx8N" Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FgbHutG_GXq for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 00:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fout-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 847BE3249AB8 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 00:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.phl.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5439813802BA for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 03:40:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 08 Jun 2025 03:40:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1749368445; x=1749454845; bh=lV8jF9Ga28uPIB1cZJH7pdi/ymGUKVZVxW3 B8VPumxU=; b=nIgVagORWw9UiL9WzQuNldjw6oz1cfWLVOeANsKaO/Bkag1kCNy CYuw7h8/naqRoIsxS9IcnH1nxjtr6X31LD9RtU1tY8RdDwQsTifMqkPSYYzPL1df sujLR3cqfT/Q8rdG2ctGrMkpUuTO5AjVEBQgLtqVJNQV1BXSKABSs/QW49e/zKpf a/eHRsyTCRNOzZB6b71ncP/KtuneP0Fj92KlMjx9K2+UL5j5MBGEICmZRNxiK7XD Cds1gKTB+1x8YN+E2HSuefxmLMvADifg+wYZnqgUq2u7WkY8Ye1FEk0FrhzCoSEb vYFGptR1mJdK79eCGNqZvmJEHI85kQXrPBQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1749368445; x=1749454845; bh=l V8jF9Ga28uPIB1cZJH7pdi/ymGUKVZVxW3B8VPumxU=; b=k8runx8NQhyH1cIKv ERAibkXvLGFrJaXVR2t3XLZAErLILb/O+F/SgsQGcUsqKTavUFRa27hlFuwNv5Ns VkrkgbpRJMhk1Q24/LXNPHkAnVt3CloOUI3TOAZu2OL9Drs7mUKlsAoCsTV7Pty4 FWJ83XH3VQQFsQRzgdf4EoDMWX+uMHZQc4gLjNrIc9NIOFaz1EWscTeMRGgyvhyv ttI2pMyxC5wh/ZQpgzvbpjGDcM1HVNpz1pzc+e3gEooPXg7nZxBXFAF4TA9h8pN7 qzvdCrxRNHd7sr+B3nvNiVueHNkn50FoR4aSOIw4G8xwfCt/rvY/F7R0QlTHBH2I OmeGQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugdejheeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfih gvlhguucdlgeelmdenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeft vghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopg hnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvddu teejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrih hnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtpdhnsggprh gtphhtthhopedupdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehtlhhssehivght fhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2025 03:40:44 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============8068162157936802389==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Repository Activity Summary Bot To: tls@ietf.org Message-Id: <20250608074045.847BE3249AB8@mail2.ietf.org> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 00:40:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID-Hash: FZPDAJNE73ANDPGWAPIAOYXJ2GFSBA3R X-Message-ID-Hash: FZPDAJNE73ANDPGWAPIAOYXJ2GFSBA3R X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BTLS=5D_Weekly_github_digest_=28TLS_Working_Group_Drafts=29?= List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --===============8068162157936802389== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Issues ------ * tlswg/dtls-rrc (+6/-4/=F0=9F=92=AC16) 6 issues created: - OPSDIR review (redux) (by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/86=20 - Section 5: Also, I think there should be a MUST statement (by thomas-fo= ssati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/84=20 - Figure 2: This seems fairly complex figure to say: (by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/83=20 - Section 9: The security consideration need to discuss the consequences = of (by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/82=20 - Artart review (by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/81=20 - OPSDIR review (by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/79=20 6 issues received 16 new comments: - #86 OPSDIR review (redux) (1 by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/86=20 - #84 Section 5 missing MUST (4 by boaks, thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/84=20 - #83 Figure 2 is complex (3 by boaks, thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/83=20 - #82 security implication of predictable cookie (6 by boaks, thomas-foss= ati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/82=20 - #79 OPSDIR review (1 by boaks) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/79=20 - #78 RRC Message Type Sub-registry should be Expert Review (1 by thomas-= fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/78=20 4 issues closed: - security implication of predictable cookie https://github.com/tlswg/dtl= s-rrc/issues/82=20 - Figure 2 is complex https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/83=20 - RRC Message Type Sub-registry should be Expert Review https://github.co= m/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/78=20 - OPSDIR review https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/issues/79=20 * tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0) 1 issues created: - Clarification on Table 3 (by muhammad-usama-sardar) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1393=20 * tlswg/tls-key-update (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC5) 1 issues created: - Missing references in introduction (by muhammad-usama-sardar) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-update/issues/27=20 2 issues received 5 new comments: - #26 Term "Forward Secrecy" is confusing (3 by hannestschofenig) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-update/issues/26=20 - #22 Extended Key Update replaces regular Key Update (2 by hannestschofe= nig) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-update/issues/22=20 Pull requests ------------- * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+0/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC1) 1 pull requests received 1 new comments: - #655 Remove spurious application profile text (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/655=20 * tlswg/dtls-rrc (+3/-2/=F0=9F=92=AC3) 3 pull requests submitted: - Add an "Operational Considerations" section (by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/87=20 - ARTART review (by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/85=20 - Joe Clarke's editorial suggestions (by thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/80=20 2 pull requests received 3 new comments: - #80 Joe Clarke's editorial suggestions (1 by hannestschofenig) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/80=20 - #75 align with rfc8447bis (+ DE rather than standards action) (2 by han= nestschofenig, thomas-fossati) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/75=20 2 pull requests merged: - align with rfc8447bis (+ DE rather than standards action) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/75=20 - Joe Clarke's editorial suggestions https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/80=20 * tlswg/rfc8447bis (+2/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC0) 2 pull requests submitted: - Address Amanda's comments (by seanturner) https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/88=20 - Address Mike's comment (by seanturner) https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/87=20 1 pull requests merged: - Address Mike's comment https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/87=20 * tlswg/rfc8773bis (+2/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC0) 2 pull requests submitted: - Update draft-ietf-tls-8773bis.xml (by russhousley) https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8773bis/pull/11=20 - Perhaps a typo? (by muhammad-usama-sardar) https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8773bis/pull/10=20 1 pull requests merged: - Update draft-ietf-tls-8773bis.xml https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8773bis/pull/11=20 * tlswg/sslkeylogfile (+0/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC0) 1 pull requests merged: - Some editorial tweaks suggested by Mike Bishop https://github.com/tlswg/sslkeylogfile/pull/31=20 * tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC12) 1 pull requests submitted: - Clarify PSKBinderEntry (by muhammad-usama-sardar) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1392=20 3 pull requests received 12 new comments: - #1392 Clarify Key for PSKBinderEntry (4 by ekr, muhammad-usama-sardar) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1392=20 - #1382 rpk misbinding and clarification (7 by ekr, ms-s) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1382=20 - #1381 external psk selfie attack (1 by ms-s) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1381=20 1 pull requests merged: - rpk misbinding and clarification https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1382=20 * tlswg/tls-key-share-prediction (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0) 1 pull requests submitted: - add missing verb (by jschauma) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-share-prediction/pull/13=20 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression * https://github.com/tlswg/dnssec-chain-extension * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-deprecate-obsolete-kex * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-cert-abridge * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ech-keylogfile * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-grease * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-vectors * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis * https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis * https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8773bis * https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption * https://github.com/tlswg/sslkeylogfile * https://github.com/tlswg/sslv3-diediedie * https://github.com/tlswg/super-jumbo-record-limit * https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-share-prediction * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-key-update * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-record-limit * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts * https://github.com/tlswg/tls12-frozen * https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-pkcs1 * https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-rfc --=20 To have a summary like this sent to your list, see: https://github.com/ietf= -github-services/activity-summary --===============8068162157936802389== Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)

Sunday June 08, 2025

Issues

tlswg/dtls-rrc (+6/-4/=F0=9F=92=AC16)

6 issues created:

6 issues received 16 new comments:

4 issues closed:

tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0)

1 issues created:

tlswg/tls-key-update (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC5)

1 issues created:

2 issues received 5 new comments:

Pull requests

tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+0/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC1)

1 pull requests received 1 new comments:

tlswg/dtls-rrc (+3/-2/=F0=9F=92=AC3)

3 pull requests submitted:

2 pull requests received 3 new comments:

2 pull requests merged:

tlswg/rfc8447bis (+2/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC0)

2 pull requests submitted:

1 pull requests merged:

tlswg/rfc8773bis (+2/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC0)

2 pull requests submitted:

1 pull requests merged:

tlswg/sslkeylogfile (+0/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC0)

1 pull requests merged:

tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-1/=F0=9F=92=AC12)

1 pull requests submitted:

3 pull requests received 12 new comments:

1 pull requests merged:

tlswg/tls-key-share-prediction (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC0)

1 pull requests submitted:

Repositories tracked by this digest:
To have a summary like this sent to your list, see: https://github= .com/ietf-github-services/activity-summary
--===============8068162157936802389==--