[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 25 October 2020 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315763A1499 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 00:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=bfcsXoTF; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=NBsfJEdy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Yn7rXLKSj3E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 00:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 684483A1471 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 00:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF59F768 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 03:35:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 25 Oct 2020 03:35:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=WO3Lu1vIeSu8clGblxbn0hvRLAt6cWFDixjjVtUsAu0=; b=bfcsXoTF FKa1FIwUbDfKMrUDFNUMbwVoUv3Rp4DGIAhtq0y/Z5RsyTQE64SXwWK2neRyA9E+ uI5FJW9UedIBOLcrQy9HtSQx6F58ki0Z3njJB7Yx26gcpp6t1Bcx/XHOpyCWcX66 EwD572bYdV92WzIMrxH1yloHBjOubodjgFjQ+1BO3LSjI4IuKVWfYsuWy55075m3 ZGdALsNP20/VkzWvdDV0czVOM4m/os/2iYUsf58HBYgQj1CLH/n83UI7j5UxvrhZ iJ26HpNFBJJPGIPyxlBdyEisPb1iuJ8BMFz50qYgC/7Scu5Gvc6v6UacVZOEhDvO cW9/24IeL+rCDQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=WO3Lu1vIeSu8clGblxbn0hvRLAt6c WFDixjjVtUsAu0=; b=NBsfJEdyHR4iozcTycuworLSzfFXxYU62kPvEZq7quBJM qFvXLoIMp9xGhRLp5ggTAhNJnsxSjZSjKOtK38VN9a1PwnPzxmb9azujgp3LVyW4 nvKZeQgn/9xNDRKnXw3byMaDEGy2YpXvySf+29cRxVJ7p0Ia0tfBQGxntyEU/OM6 bMjPL9udscGZtt9ydrxOChXUw6d0U8FnFJjRERxZ6RcGZX159vN1M61qScYvwX/e 6VpN74flh5GeaItNkdVCNrHjrzF2kXiwHOfLS21FGGDwU/GtasNutNrfoZEdMeWN mjjOkbxlkdNUJB94f0uoczru9UEw5h4qGdKektzjg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:rSqVX0x5xkTMmhxiEdMxlcXXwVVQbYPKj7QI7SC1fghoik3s1DwDHg> <xme:rSqVX4QJgpsSzwkw53qbLAM3ezGz9JxFeMam3oDo_1t5MCAOO1PHRLkNuCurAGefK Oifhr46R3OILzMlwg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrkeefgdduvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejne cuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceu ohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieet necuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphepgedtrdejledrjeehrdegud enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguohgp nhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:rSqVX2X9-j9BRf92Vz-CotqAfYNQ7-FmCfJ2vGeef29pOPD0vfT2EA> <xmx:rSqVXygOhjGewra-cnvkDrmc9ooB29QaRcPpHh2d2X5-K90z18JUdQ> <xmx:rSqVX2C773-U8m73JilBL3zOGcjp9GbUOWUK3ImdzgHgncAxuqP1nw> <xmx:rSqVX362MaT17y3h_PQ6yKHwWaLjnTLr-b-BAyO1Broohos1VVr9Vw>
Received: from fv-az60.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [40.79.75.41]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6C8833064674 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Oct 2020 03:35:09 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============7299904703910643692=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20201025073509.6C8833064674@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 03:35:09 -0400 (EDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1G5TUFR_om9djedMe6AXJixDoSQ>
Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:35:17 -0000



Issues
------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+2/-0/💬12)
  2 issues created:
  - Avoid computing a new HPKE contexts on HRR? (by davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/349 
  - General server handling of ECH extension is unclear (by davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/348 

  2 issues received 12 new comments:
  - #349 Avoid computing a new HPKE contexts on HRR? (6 by chris-wood, cjpatton, davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/349 
  - #348 General server handling of ECH extension is unclear (6 by chris-wood, cjpatton, davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/348 



Pull requests
-------------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+3/-2/💬2)
  3 pull requests submitted:
  - Clarify client and server roles (by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/350 
  - Fix ServerHello.random behavior in older TLS versions. (by davidben)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/347 
  - Fix some editorial issues (by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/346 

  2 pull requests received 2 new comments:
  - #350 Clarify client and server roles (1 by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/350 
  - #316 Require HRR-sensitive parameters match in ClientHello(Outer|Inner). (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/316 

  2 pull requests merged:
  - Fix ServerHello.random behavior in older TLS versions.
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/347 
  - Fix some editorial issues
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/346 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni
* https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts
* https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-grease