IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] extending the un-authenticated DTLS header

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 15 November 2016 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6721412957F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:39:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2t_w3X_sEsNq for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D125129411 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id r204so82487730ywb.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:39:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OP8BL+eCCWgsNBINknPYRGVm1gmr65frpGMN6DMFcJA=; b=lyTmBX20HVxy6y1p/ULmzYALWdYAYwi8P8Lr1rbgVfXu9HdwmQDP+pO74Wblh3hDyZ U5kgq3d8iBtGJvDthzoDlMzUZp+Wrfxn7CBQ8F+Np0TKQSiiyBe20pNy/4y17+JddfBZ uDV1xnn2482pEtk4fdeYR++PdEavOUUscUiDrEUAK9XJ83jqvUvGMbMLOin6L3KM/+Os +Xi+XEW5JhZlf0M8hBcNjTp+iTzSbXFBLagouD0KkHl3TkcMOR1QfwEaJMiGToqim2f6 TKdk5SSzdIIL6t/9A+XV3PW45ELdfKnbqA7gEnhf06tvpMjgjYOyAiGJ7ovQSX6Tqibn biXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OP8BL+eCCWgsNBINknPYRGVm1gmr65frpGMN6DMFcJA=; b=JMyiYPUJ3Fz/i6AbePE/VjRQ09iR835wyh6CjaQf/YEjYIVLus28gnZHF9GoyunA/C YUvWHQFoqKE9rmJrBRA3WKFEvTUEgP7+rPtgKWpvtk8fpRmuE481wR0pUpOa/AKgaMbA Y7h7Cya3yl3AWZB8hZalMh8Zj0D7kRpDjqncHJ1OH26lweRmUJxhBwID8rn/wITBB1pR yVeSurpxan1keRQ7EWDTi9Blaz82VMnyaRxMRb+VUk7IGUFt4sjvl0aWrzbeDRXy0hUW eGcgM6GDxIwu+C0OtKnlnONVIz8zpc2l/Lg5qGstgONVyTpYoeKfjHMmfncCGON3oYLw VqoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve8wFQYLS49NTxU/z7UK/uPZlrePXNhL8wdqGr9f+CXQb9ejmB1bO2Z+u/ROiwq1zLPCJUnbwslasRoIA==
X-Received: by 10.129.53.194 with SMTP id c185mr17160657ywa.205.1479170379530; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:39:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.159.141 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:38:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWJD1nC1e2FXbKCY4kAKeEWYmaKkO5+xVh5jjhuGAux+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1479128315.2624.62.camel@redhat.com> <CABkgnnUtcHN2vKxp0=xSj6Up6p1J3to2WnNUC3nPXPmjj8z9=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMhAm0JJ-NFUzCMF9E+k1B7EkcKOGA70VumEcW1pBde6g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWJD1nC1e2FXbKCY4kAKeEWYmaKkO5+xVh5jjhuGAux+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:38:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNRJ=BS8KyLXnk8B125vxrJomVnrR0c7MCbG8qxmjw4UQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142147809007205414c316c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1KGCVKBBfZ2ZVfbSsWmIHsgUg5w>
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] extending the un-authenticated DTLS header
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:39:41 -0000

See also PR#762

-Ekr


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 15 November 2016 at 09:28, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> > One way to split the difference between these two would be to use an
> > extension to negotiate the encrypted record format.
>
>
> Yes, that could work.  It would need special rules for 0-RTT, but in
> theory a negotiated extension could do anything to the protocol.
>

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email