Re: [TLS] chairs - please shutdown wiretapping discussion...

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 10 July 2017 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB5312F253 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgO0aUdUxkc0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90DA612EC41 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4A2BDD8; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:38:54 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6plrakZk6TSY; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:38:53 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.244.2.100] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F357BE38; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:38:53 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1499715533; bh=FVIWrlZEeW4uQbVBfKf1PS5vHsGUZfvGNqo/h44PNrg=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=BJzEyrevASQHrZHDtlf2LCKjJFuE1nmz6Q62OLSDWEzckgSsvPnEDaMIhp3VEeJbP HP4GHAo1I2OmwdvRDTusxk9l4FtdtFzvlO0/ZapBWECv946Fb0LEC65hjJmLKtMbtV 2EA19uA7xE313jkaNAgJ4iAH6P6q8sHAbDhp2eCU=
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Colm_MacC=c3=a1rthaigh?= <colm@allcosts.net>, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
Cc: "Polk, Tim (Fed)" <william.polk@nist.gov>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <E9640B43-B3AD-48D7-910D-F284030B5466@nist.gov> <1499699684.2933.20.camel@redhat.com> <CAAF6GDe1RBgPbh1y-sVdPkN5FWV6NFuYxOgZJEEvZr+0O4vcWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <822604a1-61ca-a13c-9b6f-2cd7b57cadf9@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:38:52 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAF6GDe1RBgPbh1y-sVdPkN5FWV6NFuYxOgZJEEvZr+0O4vcWg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EtB0emqHVKS91PpPR9ldMdDuR6hqK90wl"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1M3cv3ZUl3QQghiOyo5XYuUPx0U>
Subject: Re: [TLS] chairs - please shutdown wiretapping discussion...
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:38:57 -0000


On 10/07/17 17:42, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
> It's clear that there is a strong distaste here for the kind of MITM being
> talked about

It is not (only) "distaste," it is IETF policy as a result of
a significant debate on wiretapping.

S