Re: [TLS] Fixing TLS

David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org> Tue, 12 January 2016 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <davidben@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DB31A1B28 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:25:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iW2qgGmJE52l for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:25:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 342E31A1A45 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:25:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id q21so392674110iod.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:25:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=uzmAhhsPIn7HY8KbJjVoC0n5nwTjw4iB/unxCoRPv6k=; b=RLWGFpTqvGkePKshwnlZc8RCRLLpylcbnYmXWWGVLyw5zrCynPLlWwsh8ZhkdU1kbZ qW7r/xd4ieoNSHa5u6oW2nnRDxCZlbKWa+RqZo266JfkjvaudHyzYcdJZE8QG7gV+x2m KqD6xv5U0NFbQOhgQA++9OsFlY4pPgnHYf1co=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=uzmAhhsPIn7HY8KbJjVoC0n5nwTjw4iB/unxCoRPv6k=; b=B8sY62zEewdTtAA1JlklNW3lEW5q/6I9xig7bXMr+jrqC+3+wnRRsJObW9kk8iVF83 wiAymBpS76Yr38P/JZDwhtp4jtFq2nwWRGPMF0Z7kxLsMOJHli/Yf3nll9puinVszyId qWvpLxvl+jeuc20gVJVqmuFuFsDPgu2wGDtXp2SoPtmDVB3TbpK8TkR6uRllUUVqlu+A TITy9lnVcQfXH+uGgNr7e1+CQ5YjPxrVFnOaL6IfTcc40NYhu49cmyXyJftLUU1RgMmJ BF4ez1msDVYJ8QixFW5mstxJ4uFlkelusDZXop0/NgimGy1TZ4Pv05SV3LlyTN9LfH18 DgGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9Hm6yI4pfgV3/dgZe+noT/cPeBYNiBdK868TEiCxSRi5P4qXke8z+w93PDAs2jmBu/fC0uwZ6ANNalbUk/8uVKb/GothHot/tDqj3jFsLqrHtm2E=
X-Received: by 10.107.10.65 with SMTP id u62mr119787408ioi.120.1452623122525; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:25:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4BC6849@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <201601121202.26624.davemgarrett@gmail.com> <CAK6vND9x-QOsvfA4bmz-GbbF8kEx8kv22mDPbCm=mEqXe_XvAg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK6vND9x-QOsvfA4bmz-GbbF8kEx8kv22mDPbCm=mEqXe_XvAg@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:25:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CAF8qwaDxjSviLj7xH7qXgcXiypL0A1W3PXgLf0rJrDuhWhEY=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Bowen <pzbowen@gmail.com>, Dave Garrett <davemgarrett@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ecd443654150529272d51"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1OyzMSM5tnFKwofy-_CkZT20mTw>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Fixing TLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:25:24 -0000

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:27 PM Peter Bowen <pzbowen@gmail.com> wrote:

> The gaps seem to be:
> - No TLS_ECDHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 cipher suite allocated
> (BoringSSL has an implementation using cipher suite 0xca,0xfe)
>

0xca,0xfe has since been removed as nothing was using it. I'm not aware of
anything that ever shipped with it enabled.
https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/1feb42a2fbbd8c1a1ed945edb5836d69f7241cda

David


> - DH parameters -- the alternative would be using FFDH named groups
> (draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-10), right?
>
> This would only leave "Get rid of the IPsec cargo-cult MAC truncation",
> right?
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>